Golf Ball Hardness Gradient for Approach Spin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current golf ball technologies face limitations in improving performance on 20-yard approach shots, particularly in achieving high spin rates and good shot feeling, which are crucial for skilled golfers.

Innovation Solution

A golf ball design featuring a core made from a core rubber composition containing polybutadiene, an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid, a crosslinking initiator, and a terpene-based resin, with a higher intermediate layer hardness than the cover, ensuring a Shore D hardness of less than 50 for the cover.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the paint film is improved to enhance approach shot performance, then the shot feeling and performance on approach shots are improved, but there is a limit to further improvement and other aspects of performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapproach shot performanceVSAvoidoverall performance balance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The golf ball is divided into multiple functional layers: core, intermediate layer, and cover. Each layer is optimized independently - the core uses terpene-based resin for spin rate, the intermediate layer provides hardness gradient, and the cover ensures soft feel. This segmentation allows approach shot performance to be improved without compromising overall performance balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the golf ball are given different properties: the core contains terpene-based resin specifically to increase spin rate on approach shots, the intermediate layer has higher hardness than the cover to control ball deformation, and the cover maintains Shore D hardness less than 50 for soft shot feeling. This local optimization resolves the contradiction between approach shot performance and overall performance balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If the core rubber composition is modified to increase spin rate on approach shots, then high spin rate is achieved, but the shot feeling may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin rateVSAvoidshot feeling
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The core uses a composite rubber composition combining polybutadiene base rubber with terpene-based resin. The polybutadiene provides elastic recovery for shot feeling, while the terpene-based resin increases spin rate through its molecular structure and interaction with the clubface. This composite material approach allows both high spin rate and good shot feeling to be achieved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If the intermediate layer hardness is increased to improve control on approach shots, then spin rate and control are enhanced, but the overall softness and feel may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol on approach shotsVSAvoidshot feeling softness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediate layer is positioned between the core and cover, creating a hardness gradient structure. The intermediate layer has higher hardness than the cover (Hm > Hc) to provide control and spin rate on approach shots, while the outer cover maintains Shore D hardness less than 50 to ensure soft shot feeling. This local hardness differentiation resolves the contradiction between control and softness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The golf ball achieves a high spin rate and excellent shot feeling on approach shots, enhancing performance without compromising flight distance on driver shots.

Implementation Method 1

the core is formed from a core rubber composition containing (a) a base rubber containing a polybutadiene, (b) an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms and/or a metal salt thereof as a co-crosslinking agent, (c) a crosslinking initiator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrosslinking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a material hardness (Hm) of the intermediate layer is higher than a material hardness (Hc) of the cover

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

the material hardness (Hc) of the cover is less than 50 in Shore D hardness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11167177B2Golf ball
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US11167177B2 patent drawing
  • US11167177B2 patent drawing
  • US11167177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object of the present invention is to provide a golf ball traveling a great flight distance and having a good shot feeling on long iron shots. The present invention provides a golf ball comprising a core, at least one intermediate layer covering the core and a cover covering the intermediate layer, wherein the core is formed from a core rubber composition containing (a) a base rubber containing a polybutadiene, (b) an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having 3 to 8 carbon atoms and/or a metal salt thereof as a co-crosslinking agent, (c) a crosslinking initiator, and (d) a terpene-based resin, and a material hardness (Hm) of the intermediate layer is higher than a material hardness (Hc) of the cover, and the material hardness (Hc) of the cover is less than 50 in Shore D hardness.