Golf Ball Core Composition for Tunable Spin and Feel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf ball cores do not effectively tailor hardness gradients to achieve desired performance characteristics such as spin, feel, and control for both professional and recreational players, leading to inconsistent shot dispersion and player experience.

Innovation Solution

A golf ball core composition with a tailored hardness gradient achieved through specific formulations of base rubber, hardening agents, and additives, allowing for adjustable spin rates and feel by manipulating the hardness difference between the geometric center and surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the hardness gradient of the golf ball core is increased to improve spin rate on short distance shots, then spin control is improved, but the feel of the ball deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin controlVSAvoidfeel
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a non-uniform hardness distribution within the core, where the surface hardness is specifically increased relative to the core center hardness. This localized hardening at the surface provides enhanced spin control during impact while the softer core center maintains acceptable feel characteristics, thus resolving the contradiction between spin control and feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying the hardness parameter across different regions of the core. By controlling the hardness gradient (surface hardness minus core center hardness) to be between 5 and 40 Shore A, the invention optimizes the balance between spin rate enhancement and feel maintenance, allowing players to experience both improved spin control and acceptable ball feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the compression of the golf ball core is increased to affect spin rate, then spin rate increases, but the shot dispersion increases for recreational players

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin rateVSAvoidshot dispersion
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a non-uniform hardness distribution within the core, where the surface hardness is specifically increased relative to the core center hardness. This localized hardening at the surface provides enhanced spin control during impact while the softer core center maintains acceptable feel characteristics, thus resolving the contradiction between spin control and feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying the hardness parameter across different regions of the core. By controlling the hardness gradient (surface hardness minus core center hardness) to be between 5 and 40 Shore A, the invention optimizes the balance between spin rate enhancement and feel maintenance, allowing players to experience both improved spin control and acceptable ball feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a uniform hardness composition is used in the core, then the manufacturing is simpler, but the ability to tailor performance characteristics is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidperformance tailoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a non-uniform hardness distribution within the core, where the surface hardness is specifically increased relative to the core center hardness. This localized hardening at the surface provides enhanced spin control during impact while the softer core center maintains acceptable feel characteristics, thus resolving the contradiction between spin control and feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies composite materials by combining different hardness characteristics within a single core structure. The core comprises a softer inner region and a harder outer surface region, creating a composite structure that simultaneously provides good feel, controlled compression, and enhanced spin rate, thereby achieving performance tailoring without excessive manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12440731B2Golf ball core with tailored hardness gradient
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 ACUSHNET CO
  • US12440731B2 patent drawing
  • US12440731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compositions including a hardness agent and golf ball cores made from such compositions having a tailored hardness gradient are disclosed. The type and concentration of the components in the composition, including the hardness agent, affects the hardness, hardness gradient, and compression of cores made from the composition and, thus, can be used to produce a golf ball having desirable performance characteristics.