Golf Ball Core Hardness Gradients for Spin and Feel Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf balls do not adequately tailor core hardness gradients to meet the diverse performance needs of golfers with varying skill levels, leading to inconsistent spin rates and feel, which can affect shot control and comfort.

Innovation Solution

Golf balls with core layers featuring tailored hardness gradients, achieved through the use of specific rubber compositions and water-releasing agents during curing, allowing for positive and zero hardness gradients in different layers, to control spin rates and feel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the core hardness gradient is increased to reduce spin rate, then spin control for recreational players is improved, but shot dispersion increases for skilled players who need high spin for control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespin controlVSAvoidshot consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different hardness gradients in different core layers. The inner core layer has a first hardness gradient while the outer core layer has a second hardness gradient, allowing each layer to contribute differently to spin control and shot consistency, thus satisfying both recreational and skilled player needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The core is segmented into multiple layers with distinct hardness gradient characteristics. This segmentation allows independent optimization of spin rate and shot consistency functions across different layers, resolving the contradiction between adaptability for different skill levels and reliability for consistent performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the core hardness is increased to improve durability, then impact durability is improved, but the soft feel that players prefer is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact durabilityVSAvoidfeel
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates local quality differences within the core structure by implementing varying hardness gradients across inner and outer layers. This allows the core to exhibit both high durability (through overall hardness) and soft feel (through localized softer regions), satisfying both durability and player comfort requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If a single core hardness gradient is used to simplify manufacturing, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but the ability to tailor performance for different skill levels is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore constructionVSAvoidperformance tailoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into multiple layers with different hardness gradient characteristics, enabling performance tailoring for different skill levels while maintaining a systematic manufacturing approach that doesn't significantly increase complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the hardness gradient values between inner and outer core layers. This allows performance optimization for different player skill levels through controlled adjustment of physical parameters during manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tailored hardness gradients in golf ball cores provide improved spin control and feel, enhancing player performance by adjusting spin rates and durability based on skill level, thus improving shot accuracy and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

the rubber composition including a base rubber, an organic peroxide, a cross-linking co-agent, at least two water releasing agents, the water releasing agents selected from the group consisting of calcium sulfate dihydrate, zinc sulfate heptahydrate, and aluminum sulfate hydrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater-releasing agent:

Implementation Method 2

the rubber composition cured under heat, the rubber composition including a base rubber, an organic peroxide, a cross-linking co-agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCross-linking:

Implementation Method 3

the core is formed from a rubber composition cured under heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat curing:

Data Source

PatentUS12478840B2Golf balls having core layers with individual hardness gradients
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ACUSHNET CO
  • US12478840B2 patent drawing
  • US12478840B2 patent drawing
  • US12478840B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Golf balls having core layers with individual hardness gradients are provided. The cores have at least one layer with an increased “positive” hardness gradient (or a “hard-to-soft” hardness) where the outer surface of the core is harder than the center. The increased positive hardness gradient can be achieved by introducing a water-releasing agent into the core rubber formulation during the curing process. The cores may also have a “zero” hardness gradient in another layer. By utilizing different hardness gradients in the core layers, the present disclosure allows for the properties of the final golf ball to be manipulated to produce desired performance characteristics.