GPU Context Controller for Dynamic Architecture Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing devices with architecturally distinct GPUs face challenges in seamless context switching, requiring user intervention and generating excessive heat due to high power consumption, with existing solutions like Apple MacBook Pro and SLI architecture not enabling dynamic, real-time switching.

Innovation Solution

A graphics processing system with a GPU Context Controller that translates architecture-neutral display list instructions into architecture-specific formats, allowing seamless transitions between architecturally distinct GPUs without user intervention, using a CPU, memory, and two GPUs with varying power consumption profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If two architecturally dissimilar GPUs are used in a computing device, then power consumption can be reduced by selecting appropriate GPUs for different tasks, but seamless context switching between them is not possible without user intervention and device reboot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidseamless context switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A context controller is introduced as an intermediary component between the CPU and two architecturally dissimilar GPUs. The context controller receives graphics commands from the CPU, determines which GPU should execute them, translates commands between different GPU instruction sets, and manages context switching automatically. This mediator enables seamless switching between dissimilar GPUs without requiring user intervention or device reboot, while still allowing the system to leverage the power consumption benefits of selecting appropriate GPUs for different tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a high-performance GPU is used, then graphics performance is improved, but power consumption and heat generation increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphics performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between two GPUs with different performance and power consumption characteristics based on the requirements of the current task. The context controller monitors graphics command complexity and workload requirements, automatically selecting the high-performance GPU for demanding tasks and the low-power GPU for simpler tasks. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize the balance between graphics performance and power consumption in real-time, rather than being locked into a static configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by switching between two GPUs with different performance and power consumption profiles. The context controller modifies system behavior by selecting which GPU is active based on task requirements, effectively changing the power consumption parameter and performance parameter dynamically. This allows the system to adapt to varying workload demands while managing power consumption appropriately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If architecturally dissimilar GPUs are used, then flexibility in power consumption options is improved, but the complexity of translating between different instruction sets increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption optionsVSAvoidinstruction set translation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The context controller is designed with multi-functionality to handle multiple GPU instruction sets and perform various translation operations. It can receive commands from the CPU, determine the appropriate target GPU, translate commands between different instruction sets, and manage context switching. This universal component consolidates the complexity of working with multiple dissimilar GPUs into a single multi-functional unit, making the system more manageable despite the architectural differences between GPUs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8310488B2Dynamic context switching between architecturally distinct graphics processors
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
  • US8310488B2 patent drawing
  • US8310488B2 patent drawing
  • US8310488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Graphics processing in a computer graphics apparatus having architecturally dissimilar first and second graphics processing units (GPU) is disclosed. Graphics input is produced in a format having an architecture-neutral display list. One or more instructions in the architecture neutral display list are translated into GPU instructions in an architecture specific format for an active GPU of the first and second GPU.