GPU Register Bank Conflict Reduction via Software Hint Thread Switch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Register bank conflicts in graphics processing units (GPUs) lead to pipeline stalls and performance issues due to unbalanced register bank usage, which existing methods attempt to address through hardware changes or complex compiler algorithms, but these approaches increase complexity and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a software hint mechanism using a thread switching field in the GPU instruction set to enable zero-cycle context switching, allowing the hardware to switch threads when a bank conflict is detected, thereby reducing conflicts with minimal hardware changes and maintaining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If multi-banked register structure is used to increase throughput, then processing speed is improved, but register bank conflicts occur leading to pipeline stalls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpipeline stall time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The compiler performs preliminary analysis of register bank usage patterns and inserts thread switch hints into the code before execution. This preliminary action allows the hardware to proactively switch threads before bank conflicts occur, preventing pipeline stalls rather than reacting to them after they happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Thread switch hints act as an intermediary mechanism between the compiler and hardware thread switching logic. These hints provide guidance to the hardware about when to switch threads, enabling coordinated action between software compilation and hardware execution to avoid bank conflicts while maintaining the benefits of multi-banked architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If hardware thread switching is implemented to reduce bank conflicts, then conflict reduction is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebank conflict reductionVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service by leveraging the compiler's existing code generation capabilities to insert thread switch hints. The hardware simply needs to detect and act on these hints rather than requiring complex autonomous analysis of register bank usage patterns, thus reducing hardware complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Thread switch hints serve as an intermediary that bridges compiler intelligence with hardware execution. This approach transfers the complexity of analyzing register usage patterns to the compiler (software) rather than requiring complex hardware logic, thereby simplifying the hardware while achieving the same conflict reduction goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If complex compiler algorithms are used to optimize register allocation, then bank conflict reduction is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregister allocation optimizationVSAvoidcompiler algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of implementing complex algorithms that analyze all possible register allocation scenarios, the compiler uses partial action by focusing only on identifying and inserting thread switch hints at critical points. This simplified approach achieves sufficient conflict reduction without requiring exhaustive optimization algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The solution extracts the essential function of conflict avoidance by separating thread switching control from the main register allocation process. Rather than attempting to optimize all register assignments, the compiler extracts and handles only the thread switching aspect, simplifying the overall optimization task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If more register banks are added to increase parallelism, then processing capacity is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processing capacityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between different threads based on register bank usage patterns indicated by thread switch hints. This dynamic thread switching allows the hardware to keep multiple register banks active and useful, improving the utilization efficiency of the existing register banks and reducing the need to add more banks to increase parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20220179655A1Systems and methods for reducing register bank conflicts based on software hint and hardware thread switch
Publication Date: 2022.06.09 INTEL CORP
  • US20220179655A1 patent drawing
  • US20220179655A1 patent drawing
  • US20220179655A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Mechanisms for reducing register bank conflicts based on software hint and hardware thread switch are disclosed. In some embodiments, an apparatus for thread switching includes a graphics processing unit (GPU) that includes a plurality of register banks to store operands that are assigned at least partially to avoid register bank conflicts. A decoding circuitry checks a thread switching field of a first instruction to be executed by a first thread. The GPU performs a thread switch mechanism to cause a second instruction to be executed by a second thread when the thread switching field of the first instruction is set.