Graphene Electrical Conductor Defect Capping for Corrosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional electrical conductors, such as those made of copper, are susceptible to corrosion, which affects signal integrity and requires costly protective coatings like gold, while graphene offers corrosion resistance but is expensive and vulnerable at grain boundaries and defects.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the deposition of a graphene layer on a substrate with selective nano-sized metal boundary cappings at defects to inhibit corrosion, using processes like electrodeposition or atomic layer deposition to target only exposed areas, reducing material usage and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a gold surface layer is applied to copper as a corrosion inhibitor, then corrosion resistance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying a uniform gold coating across the entire conductor surface, the patent uses graphene as a low-cost corrosion resistant layer with selectively deposited boundary cappings only at defect locations. This local quality approach applies protective measures precisely where needed (at grain boundaries and defects) rather than uniformly across the entire surface, reducing material costs while maintaining corrosion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If large graphene grains are manufactured to reduce boundary area and defects, then corrosion resistance is improved, but manufacturing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by depositing the graphene layer first, then selectively identifying and capping defects afterward. Rather than attempting to manufacture perfect large-grain graphene (which is time-consuming), the approach accepts typical graphene grain structures and addresses only the critical weak points (defects and boundaries) through selective boundary capping, significantly reducing manufacturing time while maintaining corrosion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The selective boundary capping process applies different treatments to different regions: defects receive protective metal cappings while defect-free graphene areas remain unchanged. This local quality differentiation allows the system to address corrosion vulnerability only where it exists, without requiring uniform optimization across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If selective boundary capping is applied to graphene defects, then material usage and cost are reduced, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The selective boundary capping process utilizes self-service mechanisms where the deposition process automatically targets defect areas through electrochemical or thermal gradients inherent to the defect sites themselves. The defects act as natural nucleation sites that attract and concentrate the boundary capping material during deposition, reducing the need for complex external patterning or masking processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances corrosion resistance and reduces manufacturing costs by selectively addressing defects in the graphene layer, making the electrical conductors more suitable for applications where stiction and corrosion are concerns, such as in MEMS switches.

Implementation Method 1

The selectively depositing may include electrodepositing boundary cappings on exposed portions of the substrate layer at the defects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Implementation Method 2

The selectively depositing may include reacting boundary capping material with exposed portions of the substrate layer at the defects to deposit the boundary cappings only at the defects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

depositing a graphene layer on the substrate layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS8889997B2Methods for improving corrosion resistance and applications in electrical connectors
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 TE CONNECTIVITY SOLUTIONS GMBH
  • US8889997B2 patent drawing
  • US8889997B2 patent drawing
  • US8889997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing an electrical conductor includes providing a substrate layer, depositing a graphene layer on the substrate layer and selectively depositing boundary cappings on defects of the graphene layer to inhibit corrosion of the substrate layer at the defects. Optionally, the boundary cappings may include nano-sized crystals deposited only at the defects. The selectively depositing may include electrodepositing boundary cappings on exposed portions of the substrate layer at the defects. The selectively depositing may include reacting boundary capping material with exposed portions of the substrate layer at the defects to deposit the boundary cappings only at the defects.