Grinding Machine Manual Infeed Mechanism for Spinning Cylinders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grinding machines for spinning cylinders require trained personnel and complex control systems, making them unsuitable for smaller spinning mills and untrained operators, as they are costly and difficult to operate intuitively.

Innovation Solution

A grinding device with a manually actuated infeed system using an eccentric drive and hand levers, allowing the swivel arm to move relative to a stationary carriage, enabling intuitive operation by non-technical personnel while maintaining precise grinding results, with features like a gas pressure spring for locking positions and a stop to limit infeed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a complex control system is used to achieve precise grinding results, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases and ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding machine enables the operator to perform the function of the complex control system through direct manual manipulation. The hand lever with visual feedback allows the operator to intuitively control the infeed, eliminating the need for sophisticated automated control systems while maintaining grinding precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex electronic control systems with a simple mechanical hand lever mechanism. The mechanical linkage provides direct, intuitive control over the infeed process, substituting automated control technology with a straightforward mechanical operation that is easier to understand and use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If automated control technology is implemented to achieve precise grinding, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for untrained personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding qualityVSAvoidoperational intuitiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The hand lever incorporates visual feedback through color changes or visual indicators that show the operator the current infeed status and grinding progress. This visual information makes the operation intuitive and self-explanatory, allowing untrained personnel to achieve consistent grinding results without complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The device provides self-guiding visual cues that enable the operator to automatically achieve the correct grinding parameters without external control systems or specialized training. The visual feedback loop allows the operator to self-correct and maintain precise grinding independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the carriage is moved continuously during grinding to advance the workpiece, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding speedVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding process is segmented into two independent functions: the carriage provides coarse positioning and support, while the hand lever provides fine, controlled infeed movement. This segmentation allows the high-precision infeed to be decoupled from the carriage positioning, eliminating the transmission of positioning errors to the grinding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hand lever acts as an intermediary mechanism between the operator and the workpiece infeed. It provides a stable, vibration-free connection that delivers precise incremental movements independent of carriage motion, serving as a mediator that isolates the grinding process from carriage positioning inaccuracies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If a manually operated infeed device is used instead of automated control, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidgrinding consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Visual feedback indicators on the hand lever provide real-time information about the infeed status and grinding progress, enabling the operator to maintain consistent grinding quality through intuitive visual cues rather than complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The hand lever incorporates visual feedback mechanisms that provide continuous information to the operator about the grinding process state. This feedback loop enables manual operators to achieve consistent precision by allowing them to see and adjust their operation in real-time without automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy and intuitive operation by untrained workers, achieving high-quality grinding results comparable to fully automatic machines, with the ability to grind spinning cylinders to a consistent final size and preventing over-abrasion.

Implementation Method 1

a gas pressure spring, which positions the arm in its mounting position and in its grinding position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure spring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

an eccentric drive is proposed for realizing the infeed device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEccentric drive: Eccentric

Implementation Method 3

a rotating grinding roller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrinding: Abrasion

Implementation Method 4

the grinding roller...grinding surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2216131B1Device for grinding spinning cylinders
Publication Date: 2011.04.27 ROSINK GMBH CO KG
  • EP2216131B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2216131B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2216131B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The machine has a pivot arm (15) supported at a carriage (2), and movable between a loading position and a grinding position, where the carriage linearly movable relative to a grinding roller (3). A feed device (30) is actuatable at a grinding surface of the grinding roller in accordance with progression of a grinding process. The pivot arm is moveable relative to the carriage by the feed device. A spindle drive (7) and a hand wheel (8) are actuatable independent of the feed device, for manual adjustment of the carriage into a desired linear position relative to the grinding roller.