Guide RNA Linker Constructs for Spacer Purity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technologies face challenges in achieving high purity and safety due to truncated spacer sequences, which can lead to off-target effects and catastrophic risks, particularly with chemically modified RNAs longer than 160 nt, lacking reliable quality control methods.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of a non-nucleotide linker in the spacer sequence of guide RNAs, combined with a DNA restriction enzyme cleavage site, to produce a short RNA fragment for precise analysis and purification, ensuring high purity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If chemically modified RNAs longer than 160 nt are used in prime editing, then the versatility and applicability of gene editing is improved, but the manufacturing precision and quality control become significantly more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability of gene editingVSAvoidquality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The guide RNA is divided into multiple segments that are chemically ligated together, with non-nucleotide linkers placed at specific positions to create identifiable fragmentation patterns. This segmentation enables precise quality control through restriction enzyme cleavage and HPLC analysis, while still achieving the required length for prime editing applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Non-nucleotide linkers are introduced as intermediary elements within the guide RNA structure. These linkers serve dual purposes: they maintain the structural integrity and function of the long guide RNA, while simultaneously creating specific cleavage sites that enable precise quality control and purity assessment through restriction enzyme digestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If guide RNA production is scaled up to kilogram levels, then the productivity is improved, but the measurement precision of spacer purity becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidspacer purity analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Non-nucleotide linkers are incorporated into the guide RNA structure during synthesis to create predetermined cleavage sites. This preliminary action enables subsequent precise measurement of spacer purity through restriction enzyme digestion and HPLC analysis, even at kilogram production scales where direct measurement becomes impractical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct physical measurement of spacer purity with an indirect biochemical assay system. Restriction enzymes are used to cleave the guide RNA at specific non-nucleotide linker sites, and the resulting fragments are analyzed by HPLC to determine spacer purity, enabling precise measurement at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If truncated spacer sequences are not minimized, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the reliability and safety of gene editing deteriorate due to off-target effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction simplicityVSAvoidsafety of gene editing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of truncated spacer sequences into a beneficial quality control mechanism. Non-nucleotide linkers are strategically placed to create specific fragmentation patterns that enable detection and quantification of truncated spacers through HPLC analysis, transforming a manufacturing challenge into a precise quality assurance tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The restriction enzyme cleavage and HPLC analysis system provides feedback on the purity of guide RNA products. By measuring the ratio of full-length to truncated spacer sequences, manufacturers can adjust production parameters to minimize truncated spacers while maintaining ease of manufacture at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables robust GMP production and quality control, minimizing truncated spacer impurities and reducing off-target risks, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy of therapeutic gene editing.

Implementation Method 1

constructs of guide RNAs incorporated with a cleavage site of a DNA restriction enzyme close to the internal end of the spacer of a guide RNA, which provides a short guide RNA fragment for accurate analysis of its spacer purity after restriction DNA cleavage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme cleavage: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS20250263693A1Guide RNA Constructs for Therapeutic Gene Editing
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 ZHONG MINGHONG
  • US20250263693A1 patent drawing
  • US20250263693A1 patent drawing
  • US20250263693A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides guide RNA (gRNA) constructs designed to enhance safety and precision in therapeutic gene editing across RNA-guided systems. The constructs incorporate a non-nucleotide linker near the middle of the spacer sequence, reducing truncated spacer impurities (e.g., n−1 variants) during production by ligating short RNA segments (e.g., 10 nt and 22 nt)—minimizing off-target risks in gene editing therapies. Additionally, a DNA restriction enzyme cleavage site near the spacer's internal end enables excision of a short RNA fragment (e.g., 32 nt for spCas9) for precise spacer purity analysis via LC-MS or electrophoresis. These features ensure robust GMP production and quality control, overcoming limitations of conventional gRNAs and long RNAs (>160 nt) used in diverse editing platforms. Applicable to CRISPR-based and other RNA-guided methods, the constructs maintain or enhance activity, offering a scalable, safe solution for therapeutic gene editing.