Haptic Feedback Steering Resistance for Traffic Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional driver assistance systems lack the ability to provide nuanced feedback and control over vehicle inputs, particularly in complex traffic situations, leading to potential breaches of traffic rules and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that adjusts resistance to vehicle inputs based on detected traffic situations, using a computing device to generate control signals that increase resistance for undesirable movements, such as exceeding speed limits or deviating from designated lanes, while providing haptic feedback to the driver, thus enhancing compliance with traffic rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional driver assistance systems provide simple warnings, then the system complexity is low, but the ability to control and guide driver behavior in complex traffic situations is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to control driver behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism by detecting driver inputs through input detection devices, evaluating traffic situations through traffic detection devices, and generating control signals that apply resistance to the input device based on the evaluation. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to dynamically control driver behavior in response to complex traffic situations, moving beyond simple warnings to active behavioral guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary control signal between the driver's input device and the vehicle's response. The computing device generates control signals that modulate the resistance applied to the input device, acting as an intermediary that translates traffic situation evaluation into physical feedback on the driver's controls, thereby enabling nuanced control of driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system increases resistance to undesirable inputs, then driver compliance with traffic rules improves, but the physical effort required by the driver increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver complianceVSAvoidphysical effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies resistance locally and selectively to specific input devices based on the detected traffic situation and the specific undesirable input detected. Rather than uniformly increasing resistance across all controls, the system targets only the specific input device and direction of input that violates traffic rules, thereby improving compliance while minimizing unnecessary physical effort for legitimate driving maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies resistance in advance to prevent undesirable inputs before they can result in traffic rule violations. By detecting the driver's intended input and the current traffic situation, the system preemptively applies resistance to block or discourage inputs that would lead to non-compliance, thereby improving driver compliance while the resistance is applied only when necessary to prevent violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Speed

If the system provides immediate haptic feedback through resistance, then driver response time improves, but the complexity of the feedback mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver response timeVSAvoidfeedback mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex electronic or visual feedback mechanisms with direct mechanical resistance applied to the driver's input device. By using actuators to generate physical resistance force or torque on the steering wheel, accelerator pedal, or brake pedal, the system provides immediate haptic feedback through the existing mechanical control interface, achieving fast driver response without requiring separate complex feedback display systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3042819B1Driver assistance system and method for assisted driving of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.03.20 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3042819B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3042819B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3042819B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention provides a driver assistance system and a method for assisted driving of a vehicle. The method comprises the steps of: detecting (S01) a movement of an input device (118; 218) of the vehicle; detecting (S02) a traffic situation in the vehicle's environment; controlling (S03) an actuator (120; 220) based on the detected movement of the input device (118; 218) and based on the detected traffic situation according to a control program, such that a first resistance to the movement of the input device (118; 218) is generated or increased, and a second resistance to a movement opposite to the detected movement is maintained or decreased; wherein a resistance value with which the first resistance is generated or to which the first resistance is increased is set depending on the detected traffic situation.