Hearing Aid Microphone Vibration Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hearing aids face imperfections due to microphone sensitivity to vibrations, leading to unwanted sound feedback and limitations in gain application, as existing solutions require complex microphone constructions or multiple diaphragms for vibration cancellation.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a microphone unit and inlet element arrangement within a hearing aid housing, where the microphone unit and inlet element are oriented such that their pressure build-ups are of equal but opposite signs, canceling out vibrations without the need for additional signal processing, using a single microphone with a larger back volume for enhanced sensitivity and noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a receiver is placed in close proximity to a microphone in a hearing aid, then the device can be made more compact, but vibrations from the receiver will be transmitted to the microphone causing unwanted sound feedback and reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing aid device sizeVSAvoidmicrophone performance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A vibration isolation element is introduced as an intermediary component between the receiver and the microphone housing. This element acts as a mechanical mediator that blocks vibration transmission while allowing the receiver to remain in close proximity to the microphone, thus maintaining compact device size while improving microphone performance stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the sensitivity of the microphone to vibrations is increased to improve sound detection, then the microphone can detect weaker sounds better, but it will also amplify unwanted vibration signals from the receiver and environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound detection sensitivityVSAvoidvibration sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration isolation element converts the harmful effect of vibrations into a beneficial filtering mechanism. It allows the microphone to maintain high sensitivity for detecting weak sound signals while selectively blocking harmful vibration frequencies from the receiver and environment, thus transforming vibration sensitivity from a disadvantage into a controlled feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If a complex microphone construction with multiple diaphragms is used to cancel vibrations, then vibration cancellation performance is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration cancellation performanceVSAvoidmicrophone construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration isolation function is extracted from the microphone construction itself and placed in a separate vibration isolation element between the receiver and microphone housing. This extraction allows the microphone to maintain a simple single-diaphragm construction while still achieving effective vibration cancellation through the dedicated isolation component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Power

If gain is increased to compensate for ear structure amplification, then the hearing aid can provide better hearing assistance, but it will also unintentionally enhance unwanted vibration signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplification gainVSAvoidunwanted signal amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Vibration isolation is implemented as a preliminary action before the sound signals reach the microphone and before amplification is applied. By blocking vibration transmission at the source (between receiver and microphone), the system prevents unwanted vibration signals from entering the amplification chain, allowing high gain to be applied safely without enhancing harmful signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This arrangement effectively cancels out microphone vibration sensitivity, improving signal-to-noise ratio and low-frequency response, while maintaining a simple construction that does not require a two-microphone setup, thus reducing unwanted sound feedback and enhancing sound reproduction.

Implementation Method 1

a movable element separates the first and second chamber... contributions from the microphone unit and the microphone inlet element, respectively, to a vibration sensitivity of the microphone... are substantially equal but of opposite sign

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3197179B1Microphone for a hearing aid
Publication Date: 2021.07.28 OTICON
  • EP3197179B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3197179B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3197179B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

An electronic device, such as a hearing aid. The electronic device comprising a microphone unit, which are arranged in a hearing aid housing so as to optimize the vibration sensitivity of the microphone unit towards changes in the environment, potentially causing the housing to be influenced by vibrations, is disclosed. Furthermore, a method of arranging a microphone unit in an electronic device is disclosed.