Helical Heat Exchanger Support with Shape Memory Fasteners

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional support arrangements for helical tube heat exchangers face challenges such as complex assembly, limited design flexibility, thermal inertia, and potential adverse effects on heat exchanger performance due to mismatched thermal expansion properties and non-optimal tube spacing.

Innovation Solution

A heat exchanger support system utilizing a curved, tubular sheet material with engagement formations and self-tightening fasteners made from shape memory alloys, allowing for customizable tube support and reduced thermal contact to enhance heat transfer efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional linear support bars with predetermined fixation points are used, then tube support strength is provided, but assembly complexity increases and design flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube support strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple modular support bars, each with standardized features. This segmentation allows independent manufacturing and assembly of individual bars, reducing overall assembly complexity while maintaining support strength through the distributed modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support bars are designed with universal features including standardized engagement formations and adjustable positioning mechanisms. This universality allows the same support bar design to accommodate various tube configurations and pitches, providing both strength and design flexibility without increasing assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If thicker support bars are used to bear large tube bundles, then support strength increases, but thermal inertia increases and heat exchanger performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport strengthVSAvoidthermal inertia
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The support bars feature localized reinforcement only at critical load-bearing points such as engagement formations and tube contact areas. The majority of the bar structure uses thinner walls, reducing overall thermal mass and thermal inertia while maintaining sufficient support strength where mechanically required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The support bars utilize thin-walled construction with strategic reinforcement, resembling flexible shell structures. This approach provides adequate mechanical strength for supporting tube bundles while minimizing thermal mass, thereby reducing thermal inertia and improving heat exchanger thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of manufacture

If linear support bars with fixed engagement points are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to various tube arrangements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddesign adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support bars incorporate adjustable and reconfigurable features such as movable engagement formations and variable positioning mechanisms. These dynamic elements allow the standardized support bar design to adapt to different tube arrangements, pitches, and configurations without requiring custom-manufactured bars for each design variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support bar design includes variable parameters such as adjustable engagement point positions, configurable spacing, and modular length options. These parameter changes enable a single standardized support bar design to accommodate multiple tube arrangements and heat exchanger configurations, providing design adaptability while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies assembly, accommodates various heat exchanger designs, matches thermal expansion properties with the tubes, and improves heat transfer efficiency by minimizing thermal inertia and contact resistance.

Implementation Method 1

self-tightening fasteners made from shape memory alloys

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape memory alloy: Shape Memory Alloy

Implementation Method 2

self-tightening fasteners

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP2899485B1Heat exchanger support
Publication Date: 2018.04.25 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • EP2899485B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2899485B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2899485B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~7C

AI summary

There is disclosed herein a heat exchanger (10) and an associated method of manufacture. The heat exchanger (10) comprises a flow conduit (14) for accommodating flow of a heat transfer fluid. The conduit is wound around a central axis (12) so as to form a plurality of turns, for example in a helical fashion. A support member (18) for the conduit (14) is formed of a sheet material shaped to extend in a circumferential direction about the central axis (12), wherein the support member is common to said plurality of turns. A plurality of fasteners (20) are arranged to attach the conduit (14) to the support member at spaced locations along its length.