Hexadentate Tripodal Metal Complexes for OLED Emitters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metal complexes used in phosphorescent organic electroluminescent devices, especially those with polypodal ligands, face challenges in synthesis complexity, efficiency, operating voltage, and lifetime, and are prone to facial-meridional isomerization.

Innovation Solution

Development of monometallic metal complexes with hexadentate tripodal ligands, where three bidentate sub-ligands are joined via a specific bridge structure, offering improved synthesis conditions and properties such as reduced reaction time and temperature, enhanced efficiency, and prevention of isomerization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If polypodal ligands are used to improve complex stability, then stability is improved, but synthesis complexity increases and reaction conditions become more severe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex stabilityVSAvoidsynthesis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hexadentate tripodal ligand is divided into three separate bidentate sub-ligands that coordinate to the metal center independently. This segmentation allows each sub-ligand to be optimized for specific binding interactions while simplifying the overall synthesis pathway compared to constructing a single complex polypodal structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bridge structure in the tripodal ligand serves multiple functions: it connects the three bidentate sub-ligands, provides structural rigidity, and enables the formation of stable octahedral complexes. This multi-functional design achieves high stability without requiring complex polypodal architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If polypodal ligands are used to improve complex stability, then stability is improved, but reaction time and temperature increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex stabilityVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The ligand structure parameters are optimized by using a bridge-connected tripodal architecture with specific bite angles and chelate ring sizes. These parameter changes facilitate faster ligand exchange kinetics and lower the activation energy for complex formation, reducing reaction time while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The bidentate sub-ligands are pre-organized in the tripodal structure with appropriate spacing and orientation, preparing them for optimal coordination to the metal center. This preliminary arrangement eliminates the need for extensive conformational adjustments during complexation, accelerating the reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional ligand structures are used, then synthesis is simpler, but efficiency and device performance are lower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis easeVSAvoiddevice efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tripodal ligand combines features of multiple ligand types: the rigidity of aromatic bridges, the chelating ability of bidentate sub-ligands, and the geometric control of tripodal architecture. This composite structure achieves high device efficiency by optimizing both photophysical properties and coordination stability, outperforming simpler ligand designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The tripodal ligand introduces a three-dimensional architecture that constrains the metal complex in a specific geometry, controlling the HOMO-LUMO gap and photoluminescence properties. This dimensional control enables tuning of device efficiency and color emission, providing performance advantages over two-dimensional ligand systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional complexes are used, then synthesis is simpler, but facial-meridional isomerization occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis simplicityVSAvoidisomerization stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid bridge structure in the tripodal ligand pre-establishes a framework that prevents the ligands from rotating or reorienting relative to each other. This preliminary structural constraint counteracts the tendency toward facial-meridional isomerization, locking the complex in a stable configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The tripodal ligand creates a spherical or near-spherical coordination environment around the metal center, with three bidentate sub-ligands arranged symmetrically. This curved, three-dimensional geometry restricts ligand movement and prevents isomerization, maintaining compositional stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS11024815B2Metal complexes
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 UDC IRELAND
  • US11024815B2 patent drawing
  • US11024815B2 patent drawing
  • US11024815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to metal complexes and to electronic devices, especially organic electroluminescent devices, comprising these metal complexes, especially as emitters, and in particular monometallic metal complex containing a hexadentate tripodal ligand in which three bidentate sub-ligands coordinate to a metal and the three bidentate sub-ligands, which may be the same or different, are joined via a bridge.