Hexagonal Cell Array Drop Pattern Generation for Nanoimprint Lithography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nanoimprint lithography techniques face challenges in efficiently generating drop patterns for precise and controlled deposition of formable material on substrates, particularly in achieving uniform drop distribution and matching the complex patterns required for advanced semiconductor fabrication.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for generating drop patterns by scanning an array of hexagonal cells, assigning fluid drops based on predetermined volumes, and recursively distributing the remaining volume among neighboring cells, ensuring accurate and uniform deposition through a controlled dispenser system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional drop pattern generation methods are used, then the process is simpler, but the uniformity and precision of material deposition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition uniformityVSAvoidpattern generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous fill area into a discrete array of hexagonal cells, each with predetermined volume associations. This segmentation enables precise control over material distribution by treating each cell as an independent unit that can be individually assigned to drops, thereby improving deposition uniformity while managing complexity through systematic discretization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different properties to different regions through the hexagonal cell array. Each cell has specific volume characteristics and can be selectively assigned to drops based on local requirements. The recursive distribution algorithm ensures that each location receives the appropriate amount of material based on its specific needs, achieving uniform deposition across varying local conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If recursive distribution algorithm is used, then the pattern accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining the hexagonal cell array structure and associating predetermined volumes with each cell before the actual drop assignment process. The scanning sequence and fill set assignments are prepared in advance, which streamlines the recursive distribution process and reduces computational complexity during execution while maintaining high pattern accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamics through the recursive distribution algorithm that adaptively assigns cells to drops based on remaining volume requirements. The algorithm dynamically adjusts the assignment process by scanning through the array, identifying unassigned cells, and recursively distributing material until the predetermined volume is achieved, allowing flexible adaptation to varying pattern requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If hexagonal cell array is used, then the fill efficiency improves, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefill efficiencyVSAvoidarray processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using hexagonal cells that can serve multiple functions: they define spatial boundaries, store volume information, guide drop assignment, and enable recursive distribution. This multi-functionality improves fill efficiency by consolidating multiple control aspects into a single unified array structure, reducing the need for separate processing systems while managing complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11556055B2Systems and methods for generating drop patterns
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 CANON KK
  • US11556055B2 patent drawing
  • US11556055B2 patent drawing
  • US11556055B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems, and methods (a) receive a predetermined fluid drop volume and an array of cells, wherein each cell in the array is associated with a respective predetermined fluid volume; (b) scan the array of cells according to a scanning sequence for a next unassigned cell and add the next unassigned cell to a respective fill set; (c) add unassigned cells neighboring the next unassigned cell to the respective fill set until an aggregate of the respective predetermined fluid volumes of the cells in the respective fill set equals or exceeds the predetermined fluid drop volume; (d) place a fluid drop in the drop pattern within an area associated with the respective fill set and mark all cells in the respective fill set as assigned; and (e) repeat (b)-(d) until all cells in the array of cells have been assigned and the drop pattern has been generated.