Hexapod Joint Force-Absorbing Structure for Shear Load

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hexapod systems used in robots for nuclear reactor inspection and repair lack sufficient load capacity and robustness, especially in environments with shear forces and high temperatures, such as sodium-cooled reactors, due to inadequate force absorption and mechanical stress distribution.

Innovation Solution

A hexapod system with a force-absorbing structure integrated into the joint, where the center of rotation of the ball joint is located within the second support, reducing unnecessary forces on linear actuators and allowing them to focus on necessary movements, while the force-absorbing structure takes up shear forces, enhancing load capacity and reducing the system's bulk and weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a conventional hexapod system is used, then the robot can achieve mobility and access difficult-to-reach areas, but the load capacity is insufficient when shear forces are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacityVSAvoidrobustness in restrictive environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is segmented into distinct functional components: a force-absorbing structure embedded in the first support, a ball joint connecting the force-absorbing structure to the second support, and linear actuators connecting the first and second supports. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific forces independently, with the force-absorbing structure taking up shear forces and the linear actuators focusing on generating motion forces perpendicular to the supports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The force-absorbing structure acts as an intermediary element between the first support and the second support. It absorbs shear forces that would otherwise be transmitted to the linear actuators, protecting them from lateral loads and allowing the actuators to operate within their optimal force generation range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the center of rotation of the ball joint is positioned away from the second support, then the ball joint can provide rotational freedom, but unnecessary forces are exerted on the linear actuators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility of second supportVSAvoidforces on linear actuators
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The center of rotation of the ball joint is positioned within the thickness of the second support, creating a balanced configuration where the lever arm between the ball joint and the second support is eliminated. This positioning ensures that forces are distributed evenly and that the linear actuators only need to generate the minimum necessary forces for movement, without additional moments caused by offset lever arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Adaptability or versatility

If pivot joints mounted in series are used, then the robot can achieve articulation and mobility, but the solution is not sufficiently robust in sodium-cooled reactor environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticulation capabilityVSAvoidrobustness in sodium-cooled reactors
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The joint employs a composite structural approach combining a force-absorbing structure embedded in the first support with a ball joint and linear actuators. This composite design creates a more robust system that can withstand the harsh conditions of sodium-cooled reactors, including high temperatures and chemically reactive environments, while maintaining full articulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Device complexity

If hexapod joints are designed without force absorption capability, then the structure can be simpler and lighter, but the load capacity is reduced when shear forces are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint structure complexityVSAvoidload capacity under shear force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The force-absorbing structure serves multiple functions: it absorbs shear forces, provides structural support, and works in conjunction with the ball joint and linear actuators to enable full hexapod functionality. This multi-functional design allows the joint to handle both shear forces and perpendicular forces effectively without requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2928650B1Hexapod system
Publication Date: 2020.12.02 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP2928650B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2928650B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2928650B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention concerns a hexapod system (1) comprising first (2) and second (3) supports and six linear actuators (10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, 10e, 10f), each linear actuator having two ends articulated respectively at the first (2) and second (3) supports by a ball and socket joint (41, 42, 43, 44), characterised in that it comprises: a force transfer structure (50) embedded on the first support (2) and coupled to the second support (3) by a ball and socket joint (51, 52) of which the centre of rotation (60) is located in the thickness of the second support (3). The invention also concerns an inspection and/or repair robot characterised in that it comprises a poly-articulated arm provided with a plurality of hexapod systems (1) according to the invention and in which the hexapod systems (1) are disposed in series.