Silicon-Carbon Negative Electrode Composition for Stable Fast Charging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium secondary batteries face challenges with the use of silicon-based negative electrode materials, which experience volume changes during charging and discharging, leading to reduced battery life and high irreversible capacity loss, while carbon-based materials like graphite have limited capacity and require improvements in life and charging efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A negative electrode composition incorporating a silicon carbon composite with a larger BET specific surface area than graphite, combined with natural and artificial graphite, and single-walled carbon nanotubes, to enhance electrode adhesion, intercalation, and deintercalation of lithium ions, thereby improving battery capacity, efficiency, and lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If silicon-based negative electrode material is used to achieve high capacity, then battery capacity is improved, but battery life is reduced due to volume changes during charging and discharging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery capacityVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the nesting principle by embedding silicon particles within a porous carbon matrix structure. The silicon is nested inside the carbon framework, allowing the carbon to accommodate silicon's volume expansion during lithiation while maintaining structural integrity. This nested configuration enables high capacity from silicon while preventing the volume changes that would otherwise degrade battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite materials by combining silicon with carbon to create a silicon-carbon composite negative electrode. The composite structure leverages silicon's high theoretical capacity (3579 mAh/g) while carbon provides structural stability and conductivity. The composite material approach allows the benefits of both materials to coexist, achieving high capacity without sacrificing battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If non-carbon-based negative electrode material (silicon, tin, oxides) is used to achieve higher energy density than graphite, then capacity is improved, but initial efficiency is reduced with large lithium consumption and irreversible capacity loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidirreversible capacity loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous carbon materials as the matrix structure for the silicon composite. The porous structure provides abundant surface area and pathways for lithium ion transport, facilitating efficient initial charge-discharge cycles. The pores accommodate volume changes and provide multiple access routes for lithium ions, reducing irreversible capacity loss and improving initial efficiency while maintaining high capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The carbon matrix acts as an intermediary between silicon and the electrolyte, mediating lithium ion transport and reducing direct contact between silicon and electrolyte that would cause unwanted side reactions. This intermediary role of carbon minimizes irreversible capacity loss while still allowing sufficient lithium ion access to silicon for high capacity utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If graphite is used as negative electrode material to ensure stable performance, then reliability is improved, but capacity per unit mass is limited at 372 mAh/g

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance stabilityVSAvoidcapacity per unit mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges graphite with silicon-carbon composite in a hybrid negative electrode structure. Graphite provides the stable, proven performance characteristics, while silicon-carbon composite contributes high capacity. The merged structure combines the reliability of graphite with the high capacity potential of silicon, achieving both stability and enhanced capacity beyond what graphite alone can provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed composition improves the life and rapid charging performance of lithium secondary batteries by maintaining electrode adhesion and facilitating smooth lithium ion intercalation and deintercalation, reducing volume expansion, and enhancing overall battery performance.

Implementation Method 1

facilitating smooth lithium ion intercalation and deintercalation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20240234690A9Negative electrode composition, method for preparing same, negative electrode and lithium secondary battery comprising same
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD

AI summary

A negative electrode composition, a negative electrode for a lithium secondary battery including the same, a lithium secondary battery, and a method for preparing the negative electrode composition are provided. The negative electrode composition comprises a silicon carbon composite, a graphite, and a negative electrode conductive material, wherein a BET specific surface area of the silicon carbon composite is larger than a BET specific surface area of the graphite.