Hinge Joint with Selective Partial Locks and Symmetric Stress Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hinge technologies face issues with stress distribution, increased size and complexity, and assembly difficulties, particularly when dealing with large or heavy doors/leaves and high cycle counts, and require rigid springs for stability, complicating design and assembly.

Innovation Solution

A hinge joint with integrated angular locking and selective partial locks, featuring a strut, abutment, engagement slots, and a pressing element, such as an elastically deformable body or tape spring, to facilitate stable intermediate opening positions and simplify assembly by distributing stresses symmetrically and reducing component complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a double-pin hinge with rolling friction interposition elements is used to achieve stable intermediate opening positions, then the door can be held in multiple partial opening configurations, but the internal stresses on the hinge components increase and the hinge size and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of intermediate opening positionsVSAvoidcomplexity of hinge components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge is divided into distinct functional modules: a pressing element module that applies force, an abutment module that receives the force, and an engagement slot module that provides positioning. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing element is extracted as a separate, simple component that can be independently designed and positioned. This extraction allows the complex stabilizing function to be achieved through a dedicated element rather than through the complexity of the entire hinge structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If rigid springs are used to maintain elastic forces for stability, then the hinge can maintain partial opening conditions, but the design and assembly become more complicated and the hinge size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance of partial opening conditionsVSAvoidcomplexity of spring design and assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing element is designed with specific geometric parameters (shape, size, material properties) that allow it to provide the necessary elastic forces without requiring complex spring mechanisms. By optimizing these parameters, the hinge achieves reliable partial opening maintenance with simpler components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the hinge components are positioned to achieve stable intermediate openings, then the door can be held firmly, but the assembly process becomes difficult requiring partial disassembly and specialized tool access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirmness of intermediate opening positionsVSAvoidease of assembly process
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing element and abutment are pre-positioned and pre-assembled in their final functional configurations during hinge manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that the stable intermediate opening positions are achieved through the inherent geometry of the assembled hinge, eliminating the need for complex field adjustments or partial disassembly during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Duration of action of moving object

If the hinge is designed for high cycle counts with large or heavy doors, then the hinge can handle demanding applications, but the encumbrances and sizing of the hinge increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of opening and closing cyclesVSAvoidsize of hinge components
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge components are designed using composite construction approaches, combining different materials and structural forms to achieve high strength and durability for demanding applications. This allows the hinge to handle high cycle counts with heavy doors while minimizing the overall size and encumbrances of the hinge assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides high reliability, easy assembly, reduced encumbrances, and optimized production costs, enabling stable intermediate opening positions with reduced mechanical wear and improved stress distribution, making it suitable for compact designs and efficient use in vehicles and furniture.

Implementation Method 1

the pressing element (8), which is configured between the base body (4) and the strut (5) and comprises at least one elastically deformable body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the pressing element (8), which is configured between the base body (4) and the strut (5) and comprises at least one tape spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4191008A1Joint for doors/furniture doors with selective partial locks
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 DE MOLLI GIANCARLO IND
  • EP4191008A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4191008A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4191008A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hinge joint comprises a main portion and an auxiliary portion respectively connectable to a fixed and a movable part of a complex object, and partial opening means operatively active between the main portion and the auxiliary portion to position the movable part in different intermediate or partial opening configurations with respect to the fixed part; said partial opening means comprise a strut connecting the main portion and the auxiliary portion, an abutment adapted to translate relatively with respect to the strut in a plurality of relative engagement positions and a plurality of engagement slots obtained on the strut and adapted to selectively receive the abutment, to each of the engagement slots corresponding to a partial opening condition of the movable part with respect to the fixed part.