Hub-less Wheel with Rolling Brace and Solid Tire

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wheel designs face limitations in weight, size, material, manufacturing process, airflow, resistance to foreign objects, imperfections, pressure, temperature, and puncture, while also being heavy and prone to air leaks.

Innovation Solution

A rolling brace system replaces the traditional wheel hub and spoke system, incorporating a soft inner rubber layer and rollers for stability and stiffness, with a cylindrical rim and hydraulic braking mechanism, allowing for larger wheel sizes and improved durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a pneumatic tire is used, then the wheel can absorb road vibration and have a larger contact surface, but it is prone to air leaks and punctures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to punctureVSAvoidrolling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the tire filling material from gas (air) to solid granular material. This parameter change eliminates air leaks and punctures while maintaining the tire's ability to conform to road surfaces. The solid material provides both structural support and vibration absorption without the weaknesses of pneumatic tires.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite structure combining a rigid rim with flexible tire layers and solid granular filling material. This composite approach integrates the strengths of different materials: the rim provides structural integrity, the tire layers provide flexibility and protection, and the solid granular material provides vibration absorption and support, achieving both reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If a solid tire is used, then the wheel gains stability and stiffness, but it increases weight and reduces pliability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the tire structure into multiple functional layers (tread layer, body layers, reinforcement layers) and fills the interior with granular material. This segmentation allows each layer to perform its specific function while the granular filling provides overall support, achieving stability without requiring a completely solid construction that would increase weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a porous or partially filled structure rather than a completely solid tire. The granular material filling creates a porous-like structure that provides structural support and stability while allowing for weight reduction compared to a fully solid tire construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Strength

If a wheel hub and spoke system is used, then the wheel can support the vehicle weight, but it increases device complexity and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the traditional wheel hub and spoke system, replacing it with a simplified rim structure and solid granular filling. The granular material assumes the load-bearing function previously performed by the hub and spoke assembly, reducing structural complexity while maintaining load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of the hub, spokes, and rim into a single integrated rim structure filled with granular material. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate hub and spoke components, reducing device complexity while the granular filling provides the necessary structural support for load bearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves significant weight reduction, enhanced durability, and improved resistance to road conditions while maintaining pliability and rolling resistance, addressing the shortcomings of previous wheel designs.

Implementation Method 1

The soft inner rubber layer, instead of air, giving it the stability and stiffness of a solid tire with the pliability and rolling resistance of a pneumatic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

A rolling brace system replaces the traditional wheel hub and spoke system, incorporating a soft inner rubber layer and rollers for stability and stiffness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction: Roller

Implementation Method 3

cylindrical rim and hydraulic braking mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS9481203B2Hub-less vehicle wheel having a solid spoke-less rim and multilayered tire
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 JOHNSON JONATHAN
  • US9481203B2 patent drawing
  • US9481203B2 patent drawing
  • US9481203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention disclosed herein is a hub-less vehicle wheel consisting of a rolling brace (14) inside a spoke-less wheel rim (12) and a two-layered solid tire (10). The outer layer of the solid tire (11) being design for contact with a vehicle road and for protecting the softer inner layer (19) with both Layers being firmly attached to the rim (12). The rolling brace (14) being designed as a support structure that attaches to a standard vehicle suspension while also negating any arbitrary forces to the tire (10).