Humanoid Transformer Robot Linkage for Stable Sitting Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing humanoid robots lack the ability to efficiently transform between configurations, such as standing and sitting, while maintaining stability and mobility, which limits their versatility and agility, especially when carrying payloads.

Innovation Solution

A humanoid robot design featuring a mobile base with mecanum wheels and a pedestal linkage that allows the upper body to pivot and rotate, enabling transformation between elevated and lowered configurations, with passive wheels providing stability and a congruent work surface, and integrated energy storage for power support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed humanoid robot structure is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but the robot cannot transform between configurations (standing/sitting) to adapt to different workspaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration transformation capabilityVSAvoidrobot structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot is divided into distinct segments: a mobile base with mecanum wheels for locomotion, a pedestal linkage with pivot joints for height adjustment, and an upper body for manipulation. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function independently while transforming between configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot employs dynamic elements including pivot joints in the pedestal linkage that allow continuous height adjustment between standing and sitting configurations, and mecanum wheels that enable omnidirectional movement. These dynamic components provide adaptability without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Length of moving object

If the upper body is elevated high above the base, then the robot has better visibility and reach, but stability decreases and mobility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupper body heightVSAvoidrobot stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The pedestal linkage uses pivot joints that allow dynamic adjustment of the upper body height. The system can transition between elevated and lowered positions based on task requirements, optimizing both visibility/reach and stability/mobility for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The upper body is separated from the base through the pedestal linkage, allowing independent height adjustment. This extraction enables the upper body to be positioned at optimal heights for specific tasks while the base maintains stability through its mobile platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Speed

If mecanum wheels are used for mobility, then the robot achieves omnidirectional movement and agility, but the robot cannot maintain stable sitting configuration without additional support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot mobility and agilityVSAvoidsitting configuration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile base is segmented with mecanum wheels for high-speed omnidirectional movement during standing tasks, while the pedestal linkage provides a separate stabilization mechanism when transitioning to sitting configuration. Each segment optimizes for its primary function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pedestal linkage acts as an intermediary between the mobile base and upper body, providing a stable platform for the upper body during sitting tasks while allowing the base to maintain mobility when standing. It mediates between the conflicting requirements of stability and mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stability of the object's composition

If passive wheels are added to provide stability in sitting configuration, then the robot achieves better stability, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesitting configuration stabilityVSAvoidwheel system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Passive wheels are extracted as a separate stabilization component that only engages when needed for sitting configuration. During standing and mobile operations, only the active mecanum wheels are used, minimizing complexity during primary mobility functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250381681A1Humanoid transformer robots and methods of controlling the same
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SANCTUARY COGNITIVE SYST CORP
  • US20250381681A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381681A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381681A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot includes a mobile base comprising a base body with a set of active wheels, an upper body comprising a torso with arms, and a pedestal linkage having a first end coupled to the base body by a first pivotable joint and a second end coupled to the torso by a second pivotable joint, wherein the pedestal linkage is pivotable relative to the base body to transform the robot between an elevated, elongated, or standing configuration and a lowered, contracted, or sitting configuration. In the second configuration, an omniwheel positioned at the base of the torso contacts the ground to improve stability of the system, and the pedestal linkage is received in a slot in the base body to produce a congruous work surface over which the torso may be rotated to face and upon which objects may be placed and manipulated during transport.