Hybrid Finite Element Circuit Simulation via Signal Element Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-speed integrated circuit, integrated circuit package, and printed circuit board design simulations face challenges with long computation times due to the complexity of full-wave solvers, particularly in handling signal transmission elements like vias and transmission lines, which are time-consuming and often result in inaccurate results over multi-GHz bandwidths.

Innovation Solution

The method involves simplifying the circuit design by removing certain signal transmission elements and incorporating their electrical parameters into a 3D finite element method analysis, allowing for faster computation while retaining the electrical impact on the package, using a hybrid approach that combines 2.5D hybrid tools with 3D solving techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full-wave electromagnetic solvers are used for accurate power and signal integrity analysis, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of power and signal integrity analysisVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the electromagnetic solver into two distinct components: a 2.5D hybrid solver that handles signal transmission elements (via holes, transmission lines) efficiently, and a 3D finite element solver that handles the remaining package structure. This segmentation allows each solver to operate in its optimal domain, with the 2.5D solver providing fast accurate results for transmission elements and the 3D solver providing accurate results for the complex 3D structure, thereby reducing overall computation time while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts signal transmission elements (via holes, transmission lines, pads) from the full 3D model and processes them separately using a specialized 2.5D hybrid solver. This extraction allows these elements to be handled more efficiently without requiring the computationally intensive 3D full-wave solver, thus reducing loss of time while maintaining the accuracy needed for power and signal integrity analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If full-wave electromagnetic solvers are used for broadband analysis, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of broadband analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of solver system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the solver system into two specialized components with distinct roles: a 2.5D hybrid solver for handling signal transmission elements and a 3D finite element solver for the package structure. Each solver is optimized for its specific domain, reducing the overall complexity compared to using a single full-wave solver for all tasks. The segmentation allows simpler solvers to be used where appropriate, reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision through the coordinated operation of both solvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If traditional 3D solving techniques are used for complex designs, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of design analysisVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the design into transmission line elements and 3D package structures, applying the most appropriate solver to each segment. The 2.5D hybrid solver efficiently handles the transmission line elements with high accuracy, while the 3D finite element solver processes the package structures. This segmentation enables the simulation to achieve measurement precision comparable to full 3D solving but with significantly reduced simulation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different solution methods with locally optimal properties to different parts of the design. The 2.5D hybrid solver is applied locally to signal transmission elements where it provides both accuracy and efficiency, while the 3D finite element solver is applied to the package structure where it provides the necessary precision. This local quality approach ensures measurement precision is improved where needed while reducing loss of time in regions where simpler methods suffice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10068039B1Systems and methods for simulating a circuit using a hybrid finite element—circuit analysis operation
Publication Date: 2018.09.04 ANSYS INC
  • US10068039B1 patent drawing
  • US10068039B1 patent drawing
  • US10068039B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for performing a simulation of an integrated circuit, integrated circuit package, or printed circuit board design. A representation of the design is accessed that includes a plurality of components inside a volume. The volume is discretized into a plurality of volumetric elements. A removable signal transmission element is identified in the volume. The signal transmission element is removed from the volume. An electrical parameter associated with the removed signal transmission element is identified. A finite element method operation is performed to identify a characteristic of the design based on the discretized volume having the signal transmission element removed and the electrical parameter, an electrical impact of the signal transmission element on the package being retained based on the electrical parameter.