Hybrid Machine Learning Control for Safe System Exploration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning methods for technical systems fail to effectively explore new measured values while avoiding unsafe states that could damage or destroy the system.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid model combining a physical and data-based model is used to learn parameters from a data set of noisy measurements, determining a control variable that maximizes information gain and ensures safe operation by incorporating probability thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If machine learning methods are used to explore new measured values in technical systems, then information gain and model improvement are enhanced, but the risk of entering unsafe states that could damage or destroy the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation gainVSAvoidsystem safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The model is segmented into two distinct components: a physics-based model that ensures system safety by respecting physical constraints, and a data-driven model that maximizes information gain from measurements. This segmentation allows each component to specialize - the physics model prevents unsafe states while the data model explores new information, resolving the contradiction between information gain and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the parameter representation by learning parameters of the physics-based model from measurement data while maintaining the structural integrity of physical laws. This allows the model to adapt to new information without violating safety constraints, enabling exploration within safe boundaries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a data-based model is used to learn from noisy measurements, then adaptability to new data is improved, but measurement precision and reliability are compromised due to noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new dataVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The physics-based model serves as an intermediary between noisy measurements and the learned parameters. Instead of directly learning from noisy data, the method uses the physics model as a mediator that filters and structures the information, allowing adaptation to new data while maintaining precision through physical constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary action by incorporating physical knowledge and constraints into the model structure before learning from data. This pre-structuring with physics-based relationships prepares the model to handle noisy measurements more effectively, improving both adaptability and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250347589A1Device and computer-implemented method for machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250347589A1 patent drawing
  • US20250347589A1 patent drawing
  • US20250347589A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and computer-implemented method for machine learning. A data set is provided, in which a measurement of an operating variable of a technical system is assigned in each case to a control variable of the technical system. Parameters of a hybrid model are learned according to the data set. A control variable of the technical system is determined according to a measure, which is dependent on the control variable, for an information gain in a measurement of the operating variable of the technical system when the technical system is operated with the control variable, and according to a probability that the operation of the technical system with the control variable is safe.