Differential Pressure Feedback for Hydraulic Pipeline Leak Shutoff
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional hydraulic pipeline rupture protection methods are inadequate for detecting minor leaks and lack intelligent control, leading to potential system failures and safety risks.
Innovation Solution
An electro-hydraulic control system utilizing differential pressure feedback and a flow rate diagnostic loop to detect pipeline leaks and automatically shut off the hydraulic actuation system when threshold conditions are exceeded, incorporating components like hydraulic actuators, electro-proportional directional valves, and a controller system.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional mechanical-hydraulic components (pipeline rupture valve) are used for protection, then the system can provide protection against substantial pipeline rupture or leakage, but it cannot respond to minor leaks and lacks the ability to monitor pipeline leakage conditions
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces traditional mechanical-hydraulic pipeline rupture valves with an electro-hydraulic control system that uses electrical sensors and control circuits to detect pipeline leaks. The system substitutes mechanical spring-based cutoff mechanisms with electronically controlled directional valves that can be precisely actuated by electrical signals from pressure sensors, enabling both substantial rupture protection and minor leak monitoring.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements a feedback mechanism where pressure sensors continuously monitor pipeline pressure conditions and feed this information back to the controller. The controller compares the feedback signal against reference values and automatically actuates the electro-proportional directional valve to cutoff fluid flow when leakage is detected, enabling continuous monitoring and automatic response to both minor leaks and substantial ruptures.
2Extent of automation
If traditional pipeline rupture valves with spring-based cutoff circuits are used, then the system provides automatic protection, but the threshold cannot be adjusted after installation and lacks intelligent control
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the static spring-based cutoff threshold with a dynamic, electronically adjustable threshold implemented in the controller. The reference value for leak detection can be modified through software or configuration without physical hardware changes, allowing the system to adapt to different operating conditions and pipeline configurations while maintaining automatic protection functionality.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent enables change of the detection threshold parameter from a fixed mechanical spring preload to a configurable electrical reference value. This allows the threshold to be adjusted electronically to match different operational requirements, pipeline sizes, and fluid conditions, providing versatility while maintaining automatic operation.
3Measurement precision
If flow meters are used to monitor pipeline conditions, then real-time monitoring is provided, but the system suffers from high cost and slow response
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the essential monitoring function from complex flow meters and implements it using simpler, more cost-effective pressure sensors combined with electronic calculation. By measuring pressure differential across the pipeline and calculating flow changes electronically, the system achieves real-time monitoring capability without the high cost and slow response characteristics of traditional flow meters.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a functional equivalent of flow meter monitoring by using pressure sensors to infer flow conditions. Instead of directly measuring flow with expensive instruments, the system copies the monitoring function by calculating flow changes from easily measurable pressure differential data, achieving the same real-time detection capability at lower cost with faster response.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables rapid detection and response to pipeline ruptures or leaks, enhancing safety and system integrity by reducing false triggers and ensuring timely protection.
Implementation Method 1
A first pressure sensor is connected to the non-rod end chamber and configured to obtain pressure information p1 of the non-rod end chamber of the hydraulic actuator. A second pressure sensor is connected to the rod end chamber and configured to obtain pressure information p2 of the rod end chamber of the hydraulic actuator.
Implementation Method 2
a hydraulic pump, and a relief valve. The hydraulic actuator has a non-rod end chamber and a rod end chamber.
Implementation Method 3
A working oil port of the first electro-proportional directional valve is connected to the non-rod end chamber, and an inlet oil port of the first electro-proportional directional valve is connected to a third pressure sensor.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided is a system for electro-hydraulic control of hydraulic pipeline rupture protection based on differential pressure feedback, which relates to the field of hydraulic control technology. The system comprises a hydraulic actuation system and a controller system. The controller system comprises a differential pressure feedback loop and a flow rate diagnostic loop. The differential pressure feedback loop is configured to obtain a flow rate signal within a hydraulic pipeline and determine a proportional signal. The flow rate diagnostic loop is configured to receive the proportional signal, and in response to determining that a duration for which the proportional signal remains outside a threshold range reaches a preset safety duration, cut off an actuating end of the hydraulic actuation system to achieve pipeline rupture protection.


