Hydraulic Suspension Mode Decoupling Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle suspension systems face challenges in providing independent control over roll stiffness, roll damping, and heave damping, often requiring high pressure fluid sources, complex control systems, and additional support components like anti-roll bars, which increase cost and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic suspension system with a mode decoupling device that allows independent tuning of roll stiffness, roll moment distribution, and heave damping by varying fluid pressure and volume between wheel rams, reducing the need for high pressure and simplifying the control system, while using resilient support means for primary vehicle support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the hydraulic system supports the vehicle body weight, then the support force is sufficient, but the pressure in fluid volumes must be high leading to seal friction and ride comfort limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport forceVSAvoidseal friction
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the support function between separate support springs (handling vehicle weight) and the hydraulic system (handling suspension control), allowing the hydraulic system to operate at lower pressures and reduce seal friction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support function is extracted from the hydraulic system and assigned to dedicated support springs, enabling the hydraulic system to focus on suspension control with reduced pressure requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the hydraulic system provides roll stiffness, then handling is improved, but the system complexity increases with additional components like anti-roll bars

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll stiffnessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines roll stiffness provision and heave damping functions into the single hydraulic system, eliminating the need for separate anti-roll bars and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic system is designed to perform multiple functions including roll stiffness, heave damping, and load compensation simultaneously, reducing the need for dedicated components for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If different pressures are used in each fluid volume to provide required support at each wheel, then the support precision is improved, but the control complexity and leakage risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport precisionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a common fluid pressure for all wheel support, eliminating pressure differentials that cause leakage and reducing control complexity while maintaining adequate support precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces seal friction, improves ride comfort, and optimizes suspension parameters by allowing common fluid pressures across volumes, minimizing leakage, and providing effective load compensation without warp stiffness, thus enhancing handling and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic system including: at least one front left, at least one front right, at least one rear left and at least one rear right wheel ram

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the compression chamber of the front left wheel ram is in fluid communication with the first balance chamber of the mode decoupling device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid communication: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

the piston rod assembly of the mode decoupling device operates to proportion fluid pressure during roll motions of the vehicle, and operates to distribute fluid between the respective fluid volumes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid distribution: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

front and rear resilient vehicle support means between the vehicle body and the wheel assemblies for resiliently supporting the vehicle above the wheel assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic support: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8123235B2Hydraulic system for a vehicle suspension
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 KINEHTIK PTI LTD
  • US8123235B2 patent drawing
  • US8123235B2 patent drawing
  • US8123235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle hydraulic suspension system has front left (15), front right (16), rear left (18) and rear right (17) wheel ram. There is a mode decoupling device (100) with first (129), second (130), third (132) and fourth (131) balance chambers formed by a cylinder/piston rod assembly (124,125,126). The compression chamber (45) of the front left wheel ram (15) is in fluid communication with the first balance chamber (129), the compression chamber (46) of the front right wheel ram (16) is in fluid communication with the second balance chamber (130), the compression chamber (48) of the rear left wheel ram (18) is in fluid communication with the third balance chamber (132), and the compression chamber (47) of the rear right wheel ram (17) is in fluid communication with the fourth balance chamber (131). There are also front and rear resilient vehicle support means between vehicle body and the wheel assemblies.