Hydrocracking Mineralized Refuse Pyrolysis Oil

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for processing mineralized refuse are inefficient and lack a mature system for scientifically and reasonably processing mineralized refuse, particularly in terms of hydrogenation conditions and energy utilization, leading to environmental pollution and unsatisfied industrial processing requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for hydrocracking mineralized refuse pyrolysis oil involving crushing, pyrolysis, hydrogenation in a series of reactors, and deep processing to produce naphtha, jet fuel, and diesel oil, utilizing a crusher, fluidized bed pyrolyzer, boiling bed reactor, and fixed bed reactors, with integrated separation and recycling of catalysts and hydrogen.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional separation technologies (wind screening, vibrating screening, drum screening) are used to separate mineralized refuse, then the separation process is simple, but the separation effect is poor due to complex composition and high moisture content of domestic waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation process simplicityVSAvoidseparation effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the separation parameters by using a fluidized bed pyrolysis process that operates at controlled temperatures (200-400°C) and uses fluidizing gas to create a fluidized state. This transforms the solid waste into a fluidized mixture, enabling effective separation based on density and size differences that cannot be achieved with traditional mechanical screening methods. The parameter change from solid-state mechanical screening to fluidized-state thermal processing resolves the contradiction between process simplicity and separation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical separation systems (wind screening, vibrating screening, drum screening) with a fluidized bed pyrolysis system that uses thermal energy and fluid dynamics. Instead of relying on mechanical forces to separate waste components, the system uses heat to decompose organic matter and fluidizing gas to create separation conditions based on density and size, thereby substituting mechanical separation with thermo-fluid dynamic separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If a single-stage hydrogenation process is used in a fixed bed reactor, then the process is simple, but the hydrogenation conditions cannot be guaranteed and energy utilization is unreasonable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation process simplicityVSAvoidhydrogenation condition guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hydrogenation process into two distinct stages: a fluidized bed reactor stage for initial hydrogenation and a fixed bed reactor stage for final hydrogenation and hydrocracking. The fluidized bed stage operates at higher temperatures (300-400°C) for rapid hydrogenation, while the fixed bed stage operates at lower temperatures (200-300°C) for complete hydrogenation and hydrocracking. This segmentation allows each stage to operate under optimized conditions, ensuring reliable hydrogenation while improving energy utilization through staged thermal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic operation by using a fluidized bed reactor for the first stage, where the fluidizing gas creates a dynamic fluidized state that enhances heat and mass transfer. This dynamic fluidized state allows for more uniform hydrogenation conditions and better control of the hydrogenation process, whereas the subsequent fixed bed stage provides stable, controlled conditions for final processing. The dynamic-to-static transition resolves the contradiction between process simplicity and condition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If mineralized refuse is excavated and processed, then recyclable components can be recovered and landfill space is freed, but the processing system is not mature and energy utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecyclable component recoveryVSAvoidenergy utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous energy utilization by coupling the fluidized bed pyrolysis reactor with a heat recovery system that captures heat from the exothermic oxidation of hydrogenated oil. This heat is then used to preheat the feedstock or generate steam, creating a continuous energy cycle. The continuous action of hydrogenation followed by hydrocracking, with integrated heat recovery, maximizes energy utilization while maintaining high productivity in recyclable component recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent recovers and reuses energy that would otherwise be lost. The exothermic heat from hydrogenation and the thermal energy from pyrolysis are recovered through heat exchangers and used to drive the processing system. Catalysts are recovered from the fixed bed reactor and reused in the fluidized bed reactor. This systematic recovery and reuse of energy and materials resolves the contradiction between high productivity and energy loss, transforming a energy-intensive process into an energy-efficient system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves efficient recovery of recyclable components, reduces environmental pollution, and enhances land resource utilization, offering economic and environmental benefits by improving energy utilization and catalyst efficiency, while maintaining a compact and reliable process flow.

Implementation Method 1

a fluidized bed pyrolyzer, used for pyrolyzing the mineralized refuse

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

a boiling bed reactor and a fixed bed reactor in series, used for hydrogenating the pyrolysis oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 3

hydrocracking mineralized refuse pyrolysis oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocracking:

Data Source

PatentUS11952540B2Method and apparatus for hydrocracking mineralized refuse pyrolysis oil
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 EAST CHINA UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US11952540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for hydrocracking mineralized refuse pyrolysis oil. The method may use the following steps: (a) crushing and pyrolyzing mineralized refuse to obtain arene and alkane precursor biomass oil; (b) hydrogenating the arene and alkane precursor biomass oil obtained in step (a), and separating the obtained hydrocrackate to obtain arene and alkane; and (c) purifying, recovering and optimizing the arene and alkane obtained in step (b), and performing deep processing to produce naphtha, jet fuel, light diesel oil, and heavy diesel oil.