Hyperloop Pod Secondary Braking for Collision Margin Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high velocities in Hyperloop systems pose a risk to passenger safety and property due to the lack of effective braking mechanisms, which is critical for commercialization and adoption, as existing braking techniques may cause damage to the track or result in uncomfortable deceleration for passengers.

Innovation Solution

A Hyperloop pod equipped with a secondary braking system that includes a transponder communication system, line-of-sight detection, and a processor to determine collision margins, engaging the secondary braking system when necessary, utilizing both electromagnetic coils and regenerative braking to manage braking forces effectively across varying velocities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional braking mechanisms are used at high velocities, then braking force is provided, but track damage occurs and passenger comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidtrack damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical contact braking systems with electromagnetic braking mechanisms. The electromagnetic coils generate magnetic fields that interact with conductive materials on the track or pod, producing braking force through electromagnetic induction rather than mechanical friction. This substitution eliminates direct physical contact between braking components and track, preventing track damage while maintaining effective braking capability at hyperloop velocities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs regenerative braking technology that converts kinetic energy into electrical energy during deceleration. By changing the operational parameters of the braking system to operate in energy recovery mode rather than pure dissipation mode, the system provides effective braking force while reducing thermal load and mechanical stress on track components, thereby preventing track damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If traditional braking mechanisms are used at high velocities, then braking force is provided, but passenger comfort deteriorates due to uncomfortable deceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic braking control system that continuously adjusts braking force based on real-time velocity, position, and acceleration data. The system modulates electromagnetic coil activation and regenerative braking engagement to maintain optimal deceleration profiles, preventing sudden or excessive braking forces that would discomfort passengers while ensuring safe stopping distances are maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates sensor systems that monitor pod velocity, acceleration, and position, feeding this data back to the braking control system. This feedback loop enables real-time adjustment of braking force application, ensuring smooth and comfortable deceleration by preventing abrupt braking actions while maintaining effective stopping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If secondary braking system is engaged frequently, then safety is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements regenerative braking that recovers kinetic energy during deceleration events and converts it into electrical energy for storage in the pod's energy storage system. By recovering rather than dissipating braking energy, the system maintains high safety through frequent braking capability while simultaneously reducing net energy consumption, as the recovered energy offsets future propulsion energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances safety by maintaining a sufficient collision margin, reducing the risk of accidents, and ensuring comfortable deceleration, thereby increasing the adoption of Hyperloop as a mode of transportation while maintaining operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The first braking force may be generated by an electromagnetic coil, wherein the electromagnetic coil is operable to generate an eddy current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

the electromagnetic coil is operable to generate an eddy current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the second braking force is generated by a regenerative braking system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRegenerative braking:

Data Source

PatentUS12091069B2System and method for hyperloop pod protection using braking systems
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 DP WORLD LOGISTICS US HOLDINGS INC
  • US12091069B2 patent drawing
  • US12091069B2 patent drawing
  • US12091069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for performing braking operations on a hyperloop pod are disclosed herein. The hyperloop pod may have a secondary braking system, wherein the secondary braking system may be operable to provide a first braking force. The hyperloop pod may have a transponder communication system and a line-of-sight system, wherein the line-of-sight system may be operable to detect a second hyperloop pod at a line-of-sight distance. The hyperloop pod may have a memory and a processor operable to detect a second hyperloop pod and determine a collision margin between the hyperloop pod and the second hyperloop pod. The hyperloop pod may engage the secondary braking system if a safety margin is equal to or greater than the collision margin.