Integrated Circuit Partitioning for Static Timing Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and size of integrated circuit designs lead to prolonged runtime and high machine memory requirements for static timing analysis (STA), making existing STA tools a bottleneck in the design flow, while current methods fail to provide fast and accurate timing estimations without significant computational resources.

Innovation Solution

The method employs hierarchy-driven and fine-grain topological clustering to partition integrated circuit designs, allowing for parallel analysis by clustering objects based on their hierarchical relations and propagating partition assignments, which includes redundancy to ensure complete timing paths and optimize STA performance without compromising accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full chip static timing analysis is performed on increasingly complex integrated circuit designs, then timing analysis accuracy is maintained, but runtime increases and machine memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming analysis accuracyVSAvoidSTA runtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the integrated circuit design into multiple partitions using topological clustering algorithms (such as METIS). The design is segmented into balanced partitions with controlled inter-partition connectivity, allowing parallel STA execution on each partition while maintaining overall timing accuracy. This segmentation reduces the computational burden on individual processing units and enables parallel processing to overcome the runtime bottleneck.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If full chip static timing analysis is performed on increasingly complex integrated circuit designs, then timing analysis accuracy is maintained, but machine memory capacity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming analysis accuracyVSAvoidmachine memory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By partitioning the design into smaller sub-circuits, the memory required for each individual STA execution is significantly reduced. Each partition can be analyzed with limited memory resources, and the results are aggregated to provide full-chip timing accuracy. This segmentation approach allows STA to scale to larger designs without requiring proportionally larger memory capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If design complexity increases due to system integration advancements, then design functionality is improved, but STA runtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign functionalityVSAvoidSTA runtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies topological clustering to divide complex designs into manageable partitions that can be processed in parallel. This segmentation strategy maintains the ability to handle increasingly complex designs with advanced functionality while preventing STA runtime from scaling linearly with design complexity. The parallel processing of partitions provides near-linear speedup for large designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic partitioning strategies that adapt to the specific characteristics of each design. The topological clustering algorithms dynamically adjust partition boundaries based on design topology, timing constraints, and interconnect patterns. This dynamic approach ensures optimal partitioning for diverse design types and complexity levels, maintaining efficient STA performance as designs evolve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If design complexity increases due to system integration advancements, then design functionality is improved, but machine memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign functionalityVSAvoidmachine memory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The partitioning approach allows complex designs with advanced functionality to be analyzed using limited memory resources by processing smaller partitions in parallel. The memory requirements scale with individual partition size rather than total design size, enabling STA on large complex designs with standard hardware resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8261220B2Path preserving design partitioning with redundancy
Publication Date: 2012.09.04 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US8261220B2 patent drawing
  • US8261220B2 patent drawing
  • US8261220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Partitioning of a design allows static timing analysis (STA), signal integrity, and noise analysis to be performed in parallel on multiple, less demanding, and more available hardware resources. Therefore, runtime and throughput of the analysis can be significantly shortened. Notably, the partitioning can include redundancy. That is, partitions are allowed to share objects in order to preserve the timing path completeness and design structural integrity. Due to this redundancy, these partitions can account for many constraints specifically imposed by STA and ensure minimal inter-partition data dependency during the analysis. Once these partitions are populated, analysis can be performed on those partitions in parallel to generate the same timing results as if the design had been analyzed flat as a single unit. Therefore, the performance of the analysis can be optimized without compromising the accuracy and quality of results.