Deadlock Detection in Integrated Circuit Power Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for integrated circuit design verification, particularly in digital/analog mixed-signal circuits, are inefficient and inaccurate in detecting deadlocks between circuit modules, as static verification only detects potential errors and simulations are time-consuming for large designs, often missing deadlocks between modules.

Innovation Solution

A deadlock detection method that retrieves power nodes, determines a starting order, and performs deadlock detection using a resource allocation graph algorithm to identify potential deadlocks in circuit paths, enabling efficient and accurate verification across all circuit modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simulation is used to verify circuit behavior, then accuracy of detecting circuit operations is improved, but verification time increases significantly for large designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of detecting circuit operationsVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into two distinct phases: static verification for individual circuit modules (fast, accurate for modules) and deadlock detection for inter-module interactions (fast, accurate for system-level deadlocks). This segmentation allows each phase to optimize for its specific purpose without the time penalty of full-system simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Static verification is performed as a preliminary action before deadlock detection. By first verifying each circuit module individually using static methods, the system prepares the foundation for subsequent deadlock detection, eliminating the need for time-consuming simulations to verify basic module functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If static verification is used to check potential errors, then verification speed is improved, but detection accuracy of functional errors deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speedVSAvoiddetection accuracy of functional errors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The verification capabilities are segmented between static verification (fast, detects potential errors within modules) and deadlock detection (fast, detects functional deadlocks between modules). Each method operates in its optimal domain, maintaining high speed while ensuring comprehensive error detection through the combination of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deadlock detection mechanism acts as an intermediary that bridges the gap between static verification and full simulation. It takes the circuit design file and module verification results as input, and provides deadlock detection output, thereby extending the capabilities of static verification to detect functional deadlocks without requiring time-consuming simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If each circuit module is verified separately, then verification efficiency for individual modules is improved, but detection of deadlocks between modules deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiency for modulesVSAvoiddetection of deadlocks between modules
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into module-level static verification and system-level deadlock detection. Module-level verification maintains high efficiency for individual modules, while the subsequent deadlock detection phase ensures reliability by specifically checking for inter-module deadlocks that would be missed in isolated module verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deadlock detection mechanism provides feedback about inter-module interactions that complements the module-level verification results. By analyzing the circuit design file and module verification outcomes, the system generates feedback information about potential deadlocks between modules, thereby enhancing overall verification reliability without sacrificing module-level efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8726206B1Deadlock detection method and related machine readable medium
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 REALTEK SEMICON CORP
  • US8726206B1 patent drawing
  • US8726206B1 patent drawing
  • US8726206B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A deadlock detection method includes: retrieving at least one power node input of a circuit design file of an integrated circuit; retrieving a starting order of the power node; retrieving a target path starting from a specific node in accordance with the starting order; and performing deadlock detection in accordance with the starting order and the target path. A non-transitory machine readable medium stores a program code, wherein when executed by a processor, the program code enables the processor to perform the following steps: retrieving at least one power node input of a circuit design file of an integrated circuit; retrieving a starting order of the power node; retrieving a target path starting from a specific node in accordance with the starting order; and performing deadlock detection in accordance with the starting order and the target path.