Imidazopyrimidine PRC2 Inhibitors via EED Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PRC2 inhibitors targeting the SET domain of EZH2 have limitations in potency, selectivity, cellular efficacy, stability, and safety, especially against EZH2-activating mutations.

Innovation Solution

Development of potent, selective, and orally active compounds that bind to the EED subunit of the PRC2 complex, inhibiting its activity regardless of EZH2 mutation status or expression levels, as represented by Formula (I).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PRC2 inhibitors target the SET domain of EZH2, then PRC2 activity is inhibited, but potency and selectivity are reduced especially against EZH2-activating mutations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepotency against EZH2-activating mutationsVSAvoidinhibitor binding specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the binding target from the catalytic SET domain of EZH2 and relocates it to the EED subunit. This extraction strategy removes the dependency on EZH2's catalytic activity for inhibitor binding, thereby maintaining potent inhibition even when EZH2 contains activating mutations that compromise SET domain function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses EED as an intermediary binding target between the inhibitor and the PRC2 complex. By binding to EED rather than directly to EZH2's SET domain, the inhibitor achieves a more reliable interaction that persists regardless of EZH2's mutational status, as EED remains functionally intact in mutated EZH2 contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If PRC2 inhibitors target EZH2, then PRC2 activity is inhibited, but cellular efficacy and safety are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellular efficacyVSAvoidtoxicity and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by directing the inhibitor's binding affinity specifically toward the EED subunit's unique structural features rather than EZH2's catalytic domain. This localized binding strategy ensures that inhibition occurs at the appropriate complex assembly point, achieving cellular efficacy while avoiding the toxicities associated with direct EZH2 targeting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If PRC2 inhibitors are developed with high potency, then therapeutic effectiveness is improved, but stability and oral bioavailability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effectivenessVSAvoidcompound stability and oral bioavailability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically modifying the chemical structure of EED-binding compounds to optimize pharmacokinetic properties. Through structure-activity relationship analysis, the patent adjusts molecular weight, lipophilicity, and metabolic stability parameters to achieve both high therapeutic effectiveness and improved oral bioavailability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250179082A1Imidazo[1,2-c]pyrimidine derivatives as PRC2 inhibitors for treating cancer
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 MIRATI THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US20250179082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250179082A1 patent drawing
  • US20250179082A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are compounds that inhibit Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) activity. In particular, disclosed are compounds of Formula (I) and pharmaceutical compositions thereof, and methods of using the compounds and pharmaceutical compositions in, for example, methods of treating cancer.