Immersion Cooling Subcooled Spray Nozzle Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional immersion cooling systems face challenges with reliability and maintenance due to integrated liquid-cooled condensers, which can introduce failure points and affect cooling efficiency, especially in smaller distributed data centers.

Innovation Solution

An immersion cooling system that uses an air-cooled condenser and a subcooled liquid working fluid, where the vapor is condensed in the headspace and the subcooled liquid is reintroduced to cool and condense the vapor, eliminating the need for a conventional condenser and enhancing reliability and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If liquid-cooled condensers are used in immersion cooling systems, then cooling efficiency is improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to additional failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the condenser from the liquid cooling loop and relocates it to operate with vapor directly in the headspace. This eliminates the liquid-cooled condenser component that introduced failure points, while maintaining condensation functionality through direct vapor-liquid interaction in the immersion tank.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The working fluid vapor acts as an intermediary between the heat source and the condensation process. Instead of using a separate liquid-cooled condenser, the vapor itself mediates the heat transfer by condensing directly onto the cooler liquid surface, eliminating the need for additional cooling loops and components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Temperature

If integrated liquid-cooled condensers are used, then heat management is improved, but maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat managementVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The condenser function is extracted from the complex liquid cooling system and simplified to a passive thermal process occurring in the headspace. This reduces maintenance complexity by eliminating pumps, tubes, and associated components that require servicing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own working fluid in a self-regulating manner: vapor rises and condenses on cooler liquid surfaces automatically based on temperature gradients, without requiring active control systems or maintenance intervention. The working fluid serves and maintains itself through natural thermodynamic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional condensers are eliminated, then system reliability is improved, but vapor condensation efficiency may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidvapor condensation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system leverages the phase transition of the working fluid from vapor to liquid directly in the headspace. This natural phase change process provides efficient condensation without mechanical condensers, as the latent heat release during condensation directly pre-cools the returning liquid, maintaining high thermal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters by allowing the liquid temperature to be maintained below the vapor condensation temperature through the subcooling process. This temperature differential parameter enables efficient spontaneous condensation without requiring active cooling systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves the reliability and maintenance efficiency of the cooling system by removing potential failure points and allowing for effective heat management without the risks associated with liquid-cooled condensers, while maintaining high cooling efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The heat exchanger is configured to transfer thermal energy from the working fluid to ambient air to cool the working fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

the second fluid conduit provides fluid communication from the heat exchanger to a spray nozzle to spray working fluid into the immersion tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid spray: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 3

The vapor in the cooling liquid can be condensed and returned to the immersion tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS20240138112A1Systems and methods for immersion cooling with subcooled spray
Publication Date: 2024.04.25 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20240138112A1 patent drawing
  • US20240138112A1 patent drawing
  • US20240138112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A thermal management system for cooling electronics includes an immersion tank, a working fluid in the immersion tank, a heat exchanger, a first fluid conduit, and a second fluid conduit. The heat exchanger is configured to transfer thermal energy from the working fluid to ambient air to cool the working fluid. The first fluid conduit provides fluid communication from the immersion tank to the heat exchanger, and the second fluid conduit provides fluid communication from the heat exchanger to a spray nozzle to spray working fluid into the immersion tank.