Immobilized mRNA Capping with Integrated Reaction and Purification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mRNA capping methods involve numerous steps, are costly, result in low yield and high loss, and are prone to mRNA degradation.

Innovation Solution

A method for capping mRNA by connecting it to a stationary phase for a capping reaction, followed by washing and elution, reducing the need for separate purification steps and improving yield and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If enzymatic capping is used with multiple reaction components and five-step operation, then the capping reaction can be performed, but the process becomes complex, costly, and results in low mRNA yield and high loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping reaction completenessVSAvoidnumber of reaction steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple capping reaction steps into a single integrated process. The stationary phase simultaneously provides binding sites for mRNA and catalytic sites for capping enzymes, allowing cap formation, enzyme inactivation, and mRNA purification to occur in one operation rather than requiring separate adsorption, reaction, and purification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stationary phase acts as an intermediary carrier that facilitates the capping reaction. It provides a controlled environment where mRNA binds, capping enzymes act, and reaction byproducts are separated, eliminating the need for multiple separate purification steps while maintaining reaction completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional enzymatic capping with five-step operation is used, then capping can be achieved, but the cost increases and mRNA yield decreases due to multiple separation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping reaction completenessVSAvoidmRNA loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the capping reaction with purification functions into a single step. The stationary phase simultaneously performs mRNA binding, cap formation, and separation of reaction components, eliminating multiple separation steps that cause mRNA loss and reducing overall mRNA loss while maintaining complete capping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple separation steps are used in enzymatic capping, then purification can be achieved, but the process time increases and mRNA is prone to degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemRNA purification qualityVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines purification and capping into a single simultaneous operation. The stationary phase provides both binding sites for mRNA and catalytic sites for capping enzymes, allowing high-quality purification and complete capping to occur in one step rather than requiring multiple sequential purification steps that increase time and degradation risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If traditional enzymatic capping with many reaction components is used, then the capping reaction can proceed, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping reaction completenessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into a single stationary phase system. By combining mRNA binding, capping enzyme catalysis, and reaction component separation in one integrated platform, the method reduces the number of reagents and steps required, thereby lowering manufacturing cost while maintaining complete capping reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high efficiency, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness in mRNA capping, with yields and stability improved through a one-step elution process.

Implementation Method 1

The mRNA is connected to the stationary phase through non-covalent interactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-covalent interactions: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 2

The specific reaction mechanism of enzymatic capping is as follows: The mRNA loses a phosphate group at the 5′ end under the action of RNA triphosphatase. Then, the guanosine transferase adds the guanosine monophosphate (GMP) structure from the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) molecule to the mRNA that has lost a phosphate group. Finally, a methyl group is added to the N7 position of the guanine structure through the catalysis of guanosine methyltransferase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic catalysis: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS20250376708A1Method for mRNA Capping
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
  • US20250376708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed in the present application is a method for mRNA capping. The method comprises connecting mRNA to a stationary phase and carrying out a capping reaction to obtain a capped mRNA. The present application creatively establishes an immobilized mRNA-based capping reaction-separation coupling strategy and provides an efficient, simple, convenient, and low-cost capping method, and the capping operation can be carried out intermittently and can also be continuously carried out on a column. The present application provides a research basis for the development and application of a novel mRNA production process.