Impact Detection Device Using Dynamic Sensor Sampling Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing impact detection systems face challenges with battery life and user activation requirements, particularly in applications where continuous monitoring is impractical due to limited power availability and the need for frequent battery changes or recharging.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a sealed apparatus with a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) System on Chip, incorporating ultra-low power sensors and a protective package that switches between active, sleep, and deep sleep modes based on user activity, allowing for low-power impact detection without user intervention and extending battery life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the device continuously monitors impact using sensors, then impact detection reliability is improved, but battery life deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact detection reliabilityVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor operation modes based on detected activity. The processor transitions between active mode (continuous monitoring at high sampling rate), sleep mode (reduced monitoring), and deep sleep mode (minimal monitoring), allowing the device to maintain reliability during actual use while conserving battery life during idle periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic sampling of sensor data at different rates depending on the operational state. During active mode, sensors sample at a first sampling rate; during sleep mode, at a second sampling rate; and during deep sleep mode, at a third sampling rate. This periodic action with variable rates maintains detection capability while managing power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If the device operates in active mode continuously, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion data precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sampling rate is dynamically adjusted based on the operational mode. During active mode, the system uses a higher first sampling rate for precise motion data collection. During sleep and deep sleep modes, it transitions to lower second and third sampling rates respectively, reducing energy consumption while maintaining adequate monitoring capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the sampling rate parameter according to operational needs. By switching between first sampling rate (active), second sampling rate (sleep), and third sampling rate (deep sleep), the system optimizes the balance between measurement precision and energy consumption based on current operational state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the device requires user activation for each activity, then ease of operation deteriorates, but extent of automation improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser activation requirementVSAvoidautomatic mode switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The device automatically detects user presence and activity state through sensor data analysis, and self-adjusts its operational mode without requiring user intervention. The processor monitors sensor inputs to determine whether the user is wearing the device and automatically transitions between active, sleep, and deep sleep modes, making the system self-regulating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the device uses multiple sensors for comprehensive monitoring, then reliability is improved, but device complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically manages multiple sensors by transitioning them between different operational states. The processor activates sensors as needed based on detected conditions, turning sensors on during active mode and putting them into lower power states during sleep and deep sleep modes, thereby managing complexity through dynamic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3567378B1Impact detection
Publication Date: 2025.01.01 DR PLANT DANIEL
  • EP3567378B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3567378B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3567378B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Measures, including apparatus, methods, circuitry and computer program products for use in impact detection. Example apparatus comprises a plurality of sensors. The apparatus is configured to determine whether a user is wearing an item in which the apparatus is comprised, and in response to a positive determination, operate the apparatus in an active operating mode. The active operating mode comprises operating one or more sensors in the plurality to generate data associated with motion of the user at a first sampling rate.