In Situ Alloying for Rapid High-Entropy Alloy Composition Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The development of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) with varying compositions is challenging due to the vast space of possible variants, leading to time-consuming and expensive synthesis, characterization, and optimization processes, particularly in forming alloys with near-equimolar ratios.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the dynamic adjustment of elemental metal powder delivery rates from multiple hoppers to create distinct metal alloy samples, where each sample's composition is different, using a deposition tool with control circuitry and an energy source to deposit and remelt layers, reducing unmelted powder and porosity, and facilitating rapid production of alloy arrays with low chemical segregation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional alloy synthesis methods are used to create alloys with varying compositions, then each alloy variant requires separate synthesis and characterization processes, but this leads to time-consuming and expensive development cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloy composition controlVSAvoidalloy development speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The alloy development process is segmented into discrete compositional variants that can be independently controlled through the deposition system. Each alloy composition is defined by specific delivery rates from multiple hoppers, allowing systematic exploration of composition space while maintaining precise control over each variant's properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deposition system serves multiple functions: it synthesizes alloys, deposits them as layers, and enables rapid composition changes between samples. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would traditionally require separate synthesis and deposition processes into a single integrated system, dramatically improving development throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If multiple layers are deposited to form alloy samples, then bulk quantities can be produced for testing, but unmelted powder and porosity issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloy sample quantityVSAvoidmaterial homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The deposition process uses periodic remelting of the top layer after initial layer deposition. This periodic thermal treatment ensures complete melting and homogenization of the alloy material, eliminating unmelted powder and porosity while maintaining the ability to produce bulk quantities for various testing applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The process exploits phase transitions between solid and liquid states through controlled melting and remelting cycles. The energy source melts the deposited powder layers, ensuring complete transformation to liquid state for homogenization, then allows controlled solidification to produce dense, pore-free alloy structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Reliability

If near-equimolar ratios are targeted for high-entropy alloys, then promising material properties are achieved, but the vast compositional space makes optimization extremely challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloy performanceVSAvoidcompositional optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the delivery rates from multiple hoppers to achieve different compositional ratios. This dynamic control allows rapid transition between different alloy compositions, enabling systematic exploration of the vast compositional space that would be impractical with static synthesis methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the key parameter of material delivery rates to control alloy composition. By independently adjusting the delivery rate from each hopper, the system can precisely control the atomic ratios of alloying elements, enabling targeted exploration of near-equimolar compositions and other promising regimes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables rapid synthesis of alloy arrays with low chemical segregation, supporting high-throughput testing and characterization, and allows for the production of bulk quantities of alloys with enhanced mechanical, irradiation, and corrosion testing capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

melting the dispensed material to form solid layers on the substrate surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

remelting one or more of the deposited layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRemelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS11999011B1In situ alloying
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US11999011B1 patent drawing
  • US11999011B1 patent drawing
  • US11999011B1 patent drawing

AI summary

As may be implemented in accordance with one or more approaches herein, a plurality of metal alloy samples are formed on a surface, in which each sample has a different metal alloy composition relative to the others. Elemental metal powders are provided from hoppers at respective delivery rates and mixed, such that the mixture for each sample is set via the respective delivery rates and is different than the mixture for the other samples. Multiple layers of each mixture are deposited by dispensing and melting the mixture to form the respective samples, and one or more layer of each of the samples is remelted