Inductive Charging Switchgear for Vehicle Power Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless power transfer systems for vehicles face challenges in efficiently managing power conversion and preventing electromagnetic radiation and hard switching, especially when dealing with varying vehicle battery voltages and load conditions.

Innovation Solution

An inductive charging system with a switchgear that selectively operates between a step-up converter and a step-down converter, using a controller to manage the switching and prevent hard switching, and incorporating a forward-biased diode to prevent backfeeding, with the step-down converter capable of ramping output voltage to match the battery voltage and the step-up converter providing power factor correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a wireless power transmission system generates electric and magnetic fields for power transfer, then power transfer capability is improved, but electromagnetic radiation exposure increases creating safety and regulatory issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer capabilityVSAvoidelectromagnetic radiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between step-up and step-down converters based on real-time detection of vehicle presence and coupling conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize power transfer efficiency while minimizing electromagnetic radiation exposure by using appropriate converter configurations only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters by switching between different converter modes (step-up/step-down) and adjusting power output levels. This allows optimization of the balance between power transfer capability and electromagnetic radiation control, adapting to different coupling conditions and vehicle positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the system switches between step-up and step-down converters based on load conditions, then power conversion efficiency is improved, but hard switching transitions may cause electrical stress and reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower conversion efficiencyVSAvoidswitching reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary actions by detecting vehicle presence and coupling conditions before initiating converter switching. This advance detection allows the system to prepare appropriate switching sequences and minimize hard switching transitions, thereby maintaining reliability while achieving efficient power conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from load detection and coupling condition monitoring to control converter switching decisions. This closed-loop control ensures smooth transitions between step-up and step-down converters, preventing hard switching while maintaining optimal power conversion efficiency based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system operates with varying vehicle battery voltages, then adaptability to different vehicles is improved, but voltage matching complexity and power management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle compatibilityVSAvoidvoltage management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operation between step-up and step-down converter modes to match varying battery voltages of different vehicles. This dynamic voltage adaptation allows the system to work with a wide range of battery voltages while using a standardized converter architecture, managing complexity through controlled adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-converter architecture provides universal functionality by being capable of both stepping up and stepping down voltages. This multi-functional design allows the same hardware platform to adapt to different vehicle battery voltages without requiring vehicle-specific configurations, simplifying overall system complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures efficient power transfer with minimal electromagnetic radiation and prevents hard switching by dynamically adjusting power output and voltage to match the vehicle's battery voltage, ensuring reliable and safe charging.

Implementation Method 1

An inductive charging circuit may include a primary side and a secondary side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A step-up converter may be a boost converter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

A step-down converter may be a buck converter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10040358B2Wireless power transfer for vehicles
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10040358B2 patent drawing
  • US10040358B2 patent drawing
  • US10040358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductive charge system may include an inductive charging circuit having a switchgear configured to swap between a step-up converter and a step-down converter. The inductive vehicle charge station or system may include a controller configured to operate the switchgear to switch between the step-up converter and the step-down converter based on presence or absence of a load. The step-up converter may be a boost converter. The step-down converter may be a buck converter. The buck converter may have a maximum power output of 100 W. An output of the step-down converter may include a forward-biased diode to prevent backfeeding. The controller may be further configured to ramp an output voltage of the step-down converter from a coupling voltage to a charging voltage to prevent hard switching between the step-up converter and the step-down converter.