Inductor Coil Layout for Far-Field Interference Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensors for detecting user interaction with human-machine interfaces in mobile devices face challenges in achieving acceptable levels of sensor sensitivity, power consumption, and size, while also being susceptible to external electromagnetic interference.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves an inductive-based sensing apparatus with a unique configuration of inductor coils and mechanical members, where the inductor coils are arranged in a specific pattern to cancel out external electromagnetic interference and enhance sensitivity and power efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If an inductive-based sensor uses a single inductor coil to detect user interaction, then the sensor structure is simple, but the sensor is sensitive to external electromagnetic fields causing far field interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor coil structureVSAvoidfar field interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single inductor coil into multiple inductor coils (first inductor coils and second inductor coils) arranged in a specific pattern. Each coil is electrically coupled and contributes to the overall sensing function while the segmented arrangement enables interference cancellation through differential measurement, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and interference resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs an asymmetric arrangement of inductor coils where first inductor coils and second inductor coils are positioned at different locations relative to the mechanical member. This asymmetric configuration creates differential sensing paths that are equally affected by far field interference but differently by mechanical member displacement, enabling interference rejection while maintaining sensitivity to user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Measurement precision

If traditional force or pressure sensors are used to detect user interaction, then sensor sensitivity can be achieved, but power consumption and device size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor sensitivityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical force or pressure sensors with an inductive sensing system that uses electromagnetic fields to detect mechanical member displacement. This substitution eliminates the need for complex mechanical sensing elements, reducing power consumption and device size while maintaining measurement precision through the inductive coupling between inductor coils and the mechanical member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If mechanical buttons are used in mobile devices, then user interaction detection is reliable, but the device becomes susceptible to aging and wear reducing useful life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction detectionVSAvoiduseful life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical buttons with a virtual button interface that uses inductive sensing to detect user interaction. The mechanical member in the inductive sensor experiences minimal wear as it only requires small displacements to change the inductive coupling, significantly extending the device's useful life while maintaining reliable user interaction detection through the electrical sensing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If virtual buttons are used to replace mechanical buttons, then device waterproofing is improved, but user experience suffers without tactile feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaterproofing capabilityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a linear resonant actuator that generates mechanical vibration in response to detected user interaction with the virtual button. This vibration provides tactile feedback that mimics the sensation of pressing a mechanical button, enhancing user experience while the inductive sensing mechanism maintains waterproofing by eliminating exposed mechanical contacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces interference from external electromagnetic fields, improves sensor sensitivity, and optimizes power consumption, resulting in a more reliable and efficient detection of user interactions with human-machine interfaces.

Implementation Method 1

When current flows through the inductor, the magnetic field induced by the current further induces an eddy current inside the metal plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

When force is applied to the metal plate, changing the distance between the metal plate and the inductor, the coupling between the inductor and metal plate changes, thus modifying an effective impedance seen at the terminals of the inductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the plurality of first inductor coils and the plurality of second inductor coils are electrically coupled to one another and arranged with respect to one another such that within the plane, electrical current flowing through the inductor flows clockwise in the first inductor coils, within the plane, electrical current flowing through the inductor flows counterclockwise in the second inductor coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFar field interference cancellation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12295102B1Far field interference cancellation for resistive-inductive-capacitive sensors
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 CIRRUS LOGIC INC
  • US12295102B1 patent drawing
  • US12295102B1 patent drawing
  • US12295102B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include forming an inductor comprising a plurality of inductor coils comprising a plurality of first inductor coils and a plurality of second inductor coils, each inductor coil comprising a spiraling wire of electrically-conductive material wherein the wire of electrically-conductive material is arranged substantially in a plane, wherein the plurality of first inductor coils and the plurality of second inductor coils are electrically coupled to one another and arranged with respect to one another such that within the plane, electrical current flowing through the inductor flows clockwise in the first inductor coils, within the plane, electrical current flowing through the inductor flows counterclockwise in the second inductor coils, each first inductor coil is adjacent to at least one second inductor coil, and each second inductor coil is adjacent to at least one first inductor coil.