Industrial Scenario Simulation for Spatiotemporal Collision Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial robotics systems face challenges in safely interacting with humans and other objects in dynamic, loosely-constrained environments due to unpredictable human behavior and complex spatial and temporal interactions, leading to difficulties in accurately simulating and verifying collision risks within industrial scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A multi-state simulation method using a static 4D or 5D structure to determine possible object locations and trajectories, evaluate coincident presence probabilities, and perform detailed kinematic calculations to ensure safety thresholds are met, thereby systematically planning and validating industrial scenarios to minimize collision risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If intensive simulation and verification are performed to ensure safety in dynamic industrial environments, then safety validation improves, but computational complexity and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety validationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous simulation space into discrete volumetric cells forming a grid structure. This segmentation allows the system to divide the complex computational domain into manageable units, enabling parallel processing and reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining safety validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension to the spatial grid, creating a 4D simulation framework that tracks object positions across multiple time steps. This dimensional approach enables efficient prediction of future positions and collision detection without requiring exhaustive simulation of all possible trajectories, thereby reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If detailed kinematic calculations are performed for all possible object interactions, then collision detection accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of object trajectories and positions at discrete time steps before detailed collision analysis. By pre-computing position data and organizing it in a spatio-temporal grid, the system eliminates the need for repeated real-time calculations during collision detection, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional continuous mechanical collision detection methods with a discrete computational grid-based approach. Instead of continuously monitoring object positions and calculating intersections, the system uses grid cell occupancy analysis, substituting complex mechanical calculations with simpler computational operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the simulation model includes stochastic human behavior and sensory tolerances, then realism of the industrial scenario improves, but predictability and verification difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario realismVSAvoidverification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent models stochastic human behavior and sensory tolerances by introducing probabilistic parameters into the simulation. Instead of deterministic position and orientation values, the system uses probability distributions to represent uncertainty in human actions and sensor measurements, enabling realistic scenario modeling while maintaining mathematical tractability for verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where simulation results are used to refine and validate the stochastic models. By iteratively comparing simulated outcomes with expected safety requirements and adjusting probability parameters accordingly, the system verifies realistic scenarios while managing verification complexity through data-driven validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230324893A1A method and a data processing system for multi-state simulation for validating the safety of an industrial scenario
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE LTD
  • US20230324893A1 patent drawing
  • US20230324893A1 patent drawing
  • US20230324893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and data processing systems simulate and handle anti-collision management for an area of a production plant controlled by a data processing system. The method includes determining possible spatial trajectories of objects, such as humans, production components, stationary and mobile robots, AGV's and the like, in a predefined area in an industrial scenario, such as a production process, an assembling process, material handling, item sorting and the like. A static 4D structure of the area where the possible locations of the objects are determined in terms of their location and the time that the object will be in that location is determined in order to identify potential collision events and remedy those potential collision events.