Inertial Sensor Damping via Local Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inertial sensing devices in unmanned vehicles, such as IMUs, are susceptible to noise and measurement drift due to vibrations, leading to suboptimal performance in terms of sensitivity, accuracy, and response time.

Innovation Solution

The use of separately damped accelerometers and gyroscopes with customized damping elements, where the amount of motion damping is optimized for each sensor type to reduce noise and measurement drift while maintaining sensitivity and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vibration reduction strategies are applied to inertial sensing devices, then noise and measurement drift are reduced, but sensitivity, accuracy, and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidsensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different damping characteristics to different sensor types within the same inertial measurement unit. Accelerometers are coupled to the support base via damping elements with first damping characteristics, while gyroscopes are coupled via damping elements with second damping characteristics. This local differentiation allows each sensor type to operate in its optimal damping environment, resolving the contradiction between vibration reduction and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If vibration reduction strategies are applied to inertial sensing devices, then noise and measurement drift are reduced, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements sensor-specific damping characteristics where accelerometers receive damping optimized for their frequency range and gyroscopes receive damping optimized for their requirements. This local optimization ensures that each sensor type maintains its response time characteristics while still achieving vibration reduction, resolving the contradiction between reliability improvement and response time preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If uniform damping is applied to all sensors, then device complexity is reduced, but sensor performance optimization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping structureVSAvoidsensor accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs different damping elements with different damping characteristics for different sensor types. The support base includes multiple coupling mechanisms, each tailored to the specific damping requirements of the connected sensor. This approach accepts increased device complexity as necessary to achieve optimal measurement precision for each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent varies the damping parameters (damping characteristics) of the damping elements based on the specific requirements of each sensor type. By changing the damping parameters to match the optimal values for accelerometers and gyroscopes respectively, the system achieves enhanced measurement precision while maintaining manageable device complexity through systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the stability, response time, and accuracy of inertial sensing in unmanned vehicles by customizing damping parameters for accelerometers and gyroscopes, improving the overall performance of inertial measurement units.

Implementation Method 1

one or more accelerometers coupled to the support base via a first damping element configured to damp motion of the one or more accelerometers; and one or more gyroscopes coupled to the support base via a second damping element configured to damp motion of the one or more gyroscopes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10563985B2Inertial sensing device
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 SZ DJI TECH CO LTD
  • US10563985B2 patent drawing
  • US10563985B2 patent drawing
  • US10563985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for determining a spatial disposition of a movable object includes a support base configured to be carried by the movable object, a first inertial sensor coupled to the support base via a first damping element configured to damp motion of the first inertial sensor, and a second inertial sensor coupled to the support base via a second damping element configured to damp motion of the second inertial sensor. The first inertial sensor and the second inertial sensor are of different sensor types. The first damping element and the second damping element have different damping properties.