Automated Insect Detection and Removal via Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of insects such as thrips, mites, and aphids in food and crops is exacerbated by the decreased effectiveness of pesticides, making it difficult to detect and remove these pests, especially those invisible to the untrained eye, and large-scale methods often harm the food or materials being treated.

Innovation Solution

A computer image analysis system that magnifies images of substrates to detect insects using trained processors to recognize their characteristics, triggering an action head for removal or disposal, and can be mounted on movable platforms or drones for wide-area scanning and mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pesticides are used to control insects, then insect population is reduced, but effectiveness decreases over time and pesticide resistance develops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect control effectivenessVSAvoidpesticide effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical pesticides with a mechanical/optical system consisting of image capturing devices, processors, and action heads that physically remove insects through suction, impact, or other mechanical means, thereby eliminating pesticide resistance issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service insect control by using automated image recognition and response mechanisms that detect and eliminate insects without human intervention or chemical substances, making the control process self-sufficient and environmentally friendly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If large scale heating is used to eliminate insects, then insect infestation is reduced, but the food or material to be cleansed is harmed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect elimination effectivenessVSAvoiddamage to food or material
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies localized treatment by targeting only the specific locations where insects are detected through image capturing devices, using action heads to eliminate pests at precise coordinates without exposing the entire food or material to harmful heating or chemical treatments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and removes only the harmful insect elements from the food or material through targeted action heads that suction, impact, or otherwise eliminate pests while leaving the underlying substrate intact and undamaged

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection is used to detect insects, then detection accuracy for visible insects is achieved, but invisible or small insects cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection of invisible insects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates optical copies or digital representations of the inspected surface through image capturing devices, allowing enhanced visualization and analysis of insects that are too small or invisible to human eyes, thereby extending detection capabilities beyond manual inspection limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional visual inspection to multi-dimensional analysis by capturing images at different magnifications, angles, and potentially using multiple spectral ranges, enabling detection of insects across various size scales that would be imperceptible in normal viewing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If automated image analysis system is deployed, then detection precision and response speed are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by integrating multiple functions into a single platform: image capturing devices for detection, processors for analysis and recognition, and action heads for elimination, allowing one system to perform detection, identification, and treatment across various insect types and substrates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges previously separate functions (inspection, detection, analysis, and treatment) into an integrated automated platform where image capturing devices, processors, and action heads work as a unified system, reducing operational complexity despite increased technological integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3455827B1Object image recognition and instant active response with enhanced application and utility
Publication Date: 2021.01.06 FRYSHMAN BERNARD
  • EP3455827B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3455827B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3455827B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A device for pollinating plants such as flowering trees. The device is a movable platform such as a drone that has an image capturing device that is in communication with image recognition software. Images of plants are analyzed to detect objects that are consistent with pollen-receiving plants and/or plant areas. Once such plant object is detected, the device automatically disperses pollen in the proximity of the detected plant or plant object.