System-of-systems integration point specification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for transitioning from system architecture to design in system development often result in duplication of effort and inconsistencies, as they fail to effectively specify integration points between system components.

Innovation Solution

Specifying integration points by identifying and characterizing interfaces between system components, generating attributes to describe these interfaces, and specifying requirements based on those attributes, thereby linking system architecture and interface design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current techniques are used for transitioning from system architecture to design, then the development process can proceed, but duplication of effort and inconsistencies occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconsistencyVSAvoidduplication of effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by defining integration points and their attributes during the architecture phase, before the design phase begins. This upfront specification of integration points including their interfaces, protocols, and data formats prevents duplication of effort later in the design phase, as the groundwork is already established in the architecture documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal integration point model that serves multiple functions: it defines architecture relationships, specifies interface requirements, and guides design decisions. This multi-functional approach eliminates inconsistencies by using the same integration point definitions across both architecture and design phases, rather than creating separate specifications for each phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If integration points are not explicitly specified, then the transition from architecture to design can occur, but interfaces among components become inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface specification precisionVSAvoidintegration point specification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integration point specification into distinct attributes including interface identifiers, communication protocols, data formats, and interaction patterns. This segmentation allows for precise definition of each aspect of the interface while maintaining overall organization, reducing the perceived complexity through structured breakdown of the specification elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the abstract concept of integration points into concrete specifications by defining measurable parameters and attributes. By changing the representation from vague architectural concepts to specific, parameterized interface definitions, the patent achieves precise interface specifications that can be directly used in design without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8413115B1Specifying integration points of a system-of-systems
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8413115B1 patent drawing
  • US8413115B1 patent drawing
  • US8413115B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure, specifying integration points of a system-of-systems includes identifying an integration point that associates interfaces of system components. The integration point is characterized according to the identification to generate a set of attributes describing the interfaces. The integration point is specified according to the set of attributes.