Interactive Automated Driving System with Dynamic Target Ranges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated driving systems lack the ability to adapt to individual driver preferences and behaviors, leading to potential inefficiencies and safety concerns, especially in dynamic traffic conditions like stop-and-go traffic, where drivers may want to adjust vehicle spacing.

Innovation Solution

An interactive automated driving system that uses sensors and a computing device to determine a current vehicle state, generate target vehicle state ranges based on driver inputs, and adjust vehicle operations within safe limits, allowing drivers to modify behavior while ensuring safety by maintaining or changing vehicle states within predefined ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the automated driving system operates with fixed target values for vehicle control, then safety and consistency are maintained, but adaptability to individual driver preferences and dynamic traffic conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to driver preferencesVSAvoidsafety consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic target values that can be adjusted in real-time based on driver inputs and traffic conditions. The automated driving system transitions from static, pre-programmed target values to dynamic values that adapt within safe operating ranges, allowing the vehicle to respond to driver preferences while maintaining safety boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by introducing ranges of target values instead of fixed values. These parameter ranges allow flexibility in vehicle operation (such as spacing in stop-and-go traffic) while maintaining safety through defined boundaries. The system can adjust parameters like following distance, acceleration, and deceleration within acceptable ranges based on driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the system allows driver inputs to modify vehicle operation, then driver satisfaction and personalization improve, but system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver satisfactionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where driver inputs are continuously monitored and processed. The automated driving system receives feedback from driver actions (such as manual steering, acceleration, or braking inputs) and adjusts its control parameters accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that responds to driver behavior while maintaining overall safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves multi-functionality by combining automated control with driver input handling in a unified framework. The same control system manages both autonomous operation and driver-requested modifications, eliminating the need for separate systems and reducing overall complexity despite the enhanced capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If the system maintains strict target values for vehicle control, then safety and predictability are ensured, but responsiveness to dynamic traffic conditions and driver needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to traffic conditionsVSAvoidcontrol predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic target values that can adapt to changing traffic conditions while maintaining defined safety ranges. This allows the vehicle to respond quickly to dynamic situations (such as changing spacing in stop-and-go traffic) while ensuring that all adjustments remain within predictable and safe boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9454150B2Interactive automated driving system
Publication Date: 2016.09.27 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9454150B2 patent drawing
  • US9454150B2 patent drawing
  • US9454150B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, device, and methods of interactive automated driving are disclosed. One example method includes receiving a current value from one or more sensors disposed on a vehicle and determining a current vehicle state based on the current value. The method also includes generating a target vehicle state based on the current vehicle state and including a range of target values and generating a desired vehicle state. The desired vehicle state includes a desired value based on one or more driver inputs received at one or more vehicle interfaces. If the desired value falls inside the range of target values, the method also includes sending a command to one or more vehicle systems to change the vehicle state from the target vehicle state to the desired vehicle state.