Time-Interleaved ADC Reconfiguration for Variable Data Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-speed communication systems face challenges in efficiently adapting analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) to varying data rates, as existing ADCs require increased sampling rates to maintain data recovery accuracy, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors at different signaling speeds.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of time-interleaved analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) that can be reconfigured based on the data rate, utilizing multiple sub-ADCs sampling at different phases, allowing for the enabling or disabling of sub-ADC sets to match the desired data rate, thereby scaling the ADC to support higher or lower data rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the sampling rate of ADC is increased to maintain data recovery accuracy at higher signaling speeds, then data recovery accuracy is improved, but energy consumption and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ADC is divided into multiple time-interleaved sub-ADCs, each operating at a lower sampling rate. By segmenting the conversion task across multiple parallel channels with different phases, the system achieves high effective sampling rate without requiring each individual sub-ADC to operate at the full high speed, thereby reducing energy consumption per channel while maintaining overall data recovery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the sampling rate of ADC is increased to maintain data recovery accuracy at higher signaling speeds, then data recovery accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery accuracyVSAvoidADC complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ADC is divided into multiple time-interleaved sub-ADCs, each operating at a lower sampling rate. By segmenting the conversion task across multiple parallel channels with different phases, the system achieves high effective sampling rate without requiring each individual sub-ADC to operate at the full high speed, thereby reducing energy consumption per channel while maintaining overall data recovery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures the number of active sub-ADCs based on the detected data rate. At lower data rates, fewer sub-ADCs are activated, reducing complexity. At higher data rates, more sub-ADCs are enabled to maintain accuracy. This dynamic adaptation allows the ADC complexity to scale with actual requirements rather than being fixed at maximum capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If more sub-ADCs are enabled to support higher data rates, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidADC complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures the number of active sub-ADCs based on the detected data rate. At lower data rates, fewer sub-ADCs are activated, reducing complexity. At higher data rates, more sub-ADCs are enabled to maintain accuracy. This dynamic adaptation allows the ADC complexity to scale with actual requirements rather than being fixed at maximum capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ADC is designed with multiple time-interleaved sub-ADCs that can be selectively enabled or disabled based on the operating data rate. This universal design allows the same hardware structure to serve multiple data rate requirements, from lower legacy rates to higher modern rates, making the device adaptable to different communication standards and applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the ADC is reconfigured for different data rates, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rate adaptabilityVSAvoidADC complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures the number of active sub-ADCs based on the detected data rate. At lower data rates, fewer sub-ADCs are activated, reducing complexity. At higher data rates, more sub-ADCs are enabled to maintain accuracy. This dynamic adaptation allows the ADC complexity to scale with actual requirements rather than being fixed at maximum capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The ADC is designed with multiple time-interleaved sub-ADCs that can be selectively enabled or disabled based on the operating data rate. This universal design allows the same hardware structure to serve multiple data rate requirements, from lower legacy rates to higher modern rates, making the device adaptable to different communication standards and applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10720936B1ADC reconfiguration for different data rates
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 ETOPUS TECH
  • US10720936B1 patent drawing
  • US10720936B1 patent drawing
  • US10720936B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver having analog-to-digital converters (ADC) is disclosed. The ADCs may be reconfigured based on the data rate of the receiver. For example, more portions of each time-interleaved ADC may be enabled to support a higher data rate of the receiver and less portions of the ADCs may be used to support a lower data rate of the receiver.