Interrupt Controller Using Shared Bus and Hierarchical Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interrupt handling systems face high implementation costs due to the need for multiple wires and complex register structures, and they struggle with level-sensitive interrupts and resource-intensive search processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for interrupt collection and reporting that uses a status indicator register, assigns unique Interrupt Source Numbers (INTSNs), prioritizes arbitration requests, compresses INTSNs, and maps them onto an interrupt source control structure to efficiently manage and deliver interrupts to the appropriate entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a wire is required for each hardware or software entity to send interrupts, then interrupt signals can be directly transmitted, but implementation costs become potentially large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt signal transmissionVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple interrupt sources are merged into a single shared bus for transmitting interrupt signals. Instead of having dedicated wires for each entity, the patent uses a common interrupt bus where multiple sources can signal interrupts, significantly reducing the number of physical connections required while maintaining reliable interrupt transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary interrupt controller is introduced between the interrupt sources and the processor. This controller manages the shared interrupt bus, arbitrates between multiple interrupt sources, and presents a simplified interface to the processor, thereby reducing implementation complexity while ensuring reliable interrupt handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If generated interrupts are written into a wide register with bits for all possible interrupts, then all interrupts can be tracked, but the processor needs to spend resources and time to search through the wide register

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt trackingVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interrupt tracking functionality is segmented into multiple smaller registers or data structures organized in a tree structure. Instead of one large wide register, interrupts are divided into groups managed by separate smaller registers, allowing the processor to search through segmented structures more efficiently and reduce the time required to identify and handle specific interrupts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the flat wide register structure into a hierarchical tree structure with multiple levels. This dimensional change allows interrupts to be organized in groups and subgroups, enabling the processor to navigate through the interrupt structure more efficiently by first identifying the group and then the specific interrupt within that group, thereby reducing search time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If each hardware or software entity stores an interrupt number for each vector number, then interrupts can be identified, but implementation cost increases due to storage requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt identificationVSAvoidstorage requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal interrupt numbering scheme where a single interrupt number can represent multiple interrupt sources or vectors. Instead of requiring separate storage for each vector number, the system uses a unified interrupt identification mechanism that can map multiple sources to a common numbering space, reducing storage requirements while maintaining precise interrupt identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If level sensitive interrupts are not supported by conventional methods, then simpler interrupt handling is used, but the system cannot handle level-sensitive interrupt requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt handling simplicityVSAvoidlevel-sensitive interrupt support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The interrupt handling system is made dynamic by implementing configurable interrupt controllers that can adapt to different interrupt types including level-sensitive interrupts. The system can dynamically adjust its behavior based on the interrupt source and type, supporting both edge-triggered and level-sensitive interrupt modes while maintaining ease of operation through automated configuration and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9460033B2Apparatus and method for interrupt collecting and reporting status and delivery information
Publication Date: 2016.10.04 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US9460033B2 patent drawing
  • US9460033B2 patent drawing
  • US9460033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system embodying the method for interrupt collecting an reporting, comprising: storing for each of at least one interrupt a status indicator, an enable status, and an interrupt delivery information in a first structure; storing for each of the at least one interrupt at least an indicator of one or more entities to execute an interrupt handler routine in a second structure; and reporting one of the at least one interrupt to the one or more entities to execute an interrupt handler routine designated in accordance with the status indicator, the enable status, the interrupt delivery information, and the at least one indicator, is disclosed.