Inverse Tyre Model for Low-Latency Wheel Slip Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle motion management systems in heavy-duty vehicles face performance limitations due to latency and inconsistent actuator and slip control assumptions, leading to sub-optimal wheel slip control and stability issues, particularly in varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control unit that utilizes an inverse tyre model to translate wheel force requests into equivalent wheel speed or slip, allowing for closer-to-wheel end control with reduced latency and faster processing, thereby improving stability and maneuverability by adjusting the model based on current operating conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If torque control is used at the actuator level without consideration towards wheel slip, then the control system is simple to implement, but wheel slip control performance deteriorates and safety functions must intervene

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation simplicityVSAvoidwheel slip control performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates equivalent wheel speed or slip values based on desired wheel forces using an inverse tyre model before actuation occurs. This preliminary transformation of control parameters enables the actuator to directly maintain target wheel slip without requiring complex real-time slip detection and correction, thus improving wheel slip control performance while keeping the control implementation relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If primary control of the actuator and slip control functions are allocated to different control units, then functional separation is achieved, but communication latencies limit slip control performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional separationVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the slip control function with the primary actuator control unit by integrating the inverse tyre model and equivalent wheel speed/slip calculation directly into the actuator control. This merging eliminates the need for communication between separate control units, removing communication latencies and enabling faster, more responsive wheel slip control while maintaining functional separation at the system architecture level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If inconsistent actuator and slip assumptions are made in multiple control units, then distributed control is achieved, but control performance becomes sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistributed control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inverse tyre model serves as a universal calculation mechanism that provides consistent equivalent wheel speed or slip values across all control scenarios and operating conditions. By using this single universal approach in the actuator control unit, the system maintains distributed control capability while ensuring consistent and accurate wheel slip control performance across all wheels and situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If torque requests are sent to wheel torque actuators, then actuator control is straightforward, but response speed to road friction changes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator control simplicityVSAvoidresponse speed to friction changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameter from torque requests to equivalent wheel speed or slip requests. This parameter transformation enables the actuator to directly control wheel slip to match target values, providing much faster response to changes in road friction conditions. The inverse tyre model continuously provides updated equivalent wheel speed/slip values based on desired forces and current conditions, maintaining simple actuator control while dramatically improving response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12559071B2Inverse tyre model for advanced vehicle motion management
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US12559071B2 patent drawing
  • US12559071B2 patent drawing
  • US12559071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control unit (130, 140) for controlling a heavy duty vehicle (100),wherein the control unit is arranged to obtain input data indicative of a desired wheel force (Fx, Fy) to be generated by at least one wheel (210) of the vehicle (100), andto translate the input data into a respective equivalent wheel speed or wheel slip to be maintained by the wheel (210) to generate the desired wheel force (Fx, Fy) based on an inverse tyre model (f−1) for the wheel (210),wherein the control unit (130, 140) is arranged to obtain the inverse tyre model in dependence of a current operating condition of the wheel (210), andwherein the control unit (130, 140) is arranged to control the heavy duty vehicle (100) based on the equivalent wheel speed or wheel slip.