Inverted L-Shaped Reinforcement Block for Bumper Beam Energy Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle bumpers often suffer from vertical misalignment during collisions, leading to inadequate energy absorption and increased damage to surrounding components, particularly in low-speed crashes, resulting in costly repairs and potential intrusion into the vehicle's interior.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement block with an inverted L-shape body is arranged on the upper portion of the bumper beam to absorb impact energy and prevent contact between the bumper beam and the fascia panel, acting as a buffer and spacer to reduce longitudinal movement and force transmission during collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the bumper beam is designed without a reinforcement block, then the device complexity is reduced and manufacturing cost is lowered, but the energy absorption capability during collision is insufficient and the fascia panel suffers damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidbumper assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement block is designed as a separate, modular component that can be independently manufactured and installed on the bumper beam. This segmentation allows the energy absorption function to be added without redesigning the entire bumper assembly, thus improving strength while minimizing the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement block is made from high-density material that provides superior energy absorption properties. By using composite material with specific density characteristics, the block achieves enhanced strength and collision resistance without requiring a large increase in size or complexity of the overall bumper assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the reinforcement block is positioned to cover the entire bumper beam, then the protection against fascia damage is maximized, but the weight and material usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection reliabilityVSAvoidbumper assembly weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement block is strategically positioned only on the upper portion of the bumper beam where collision forces are most likely to cause fascia damage. This localized placement provides protection reliability at the critical area without adding weight to the entire bumper assembly, thus balancing protection needs with weight constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of providing uniform protection across the entire bumper beam, the reinforcement block applies protection partially only where most needed. This partial action approach achieves sufficient reliability for preventing fascia damage while avoiding the excessive material usage and weight that would result from full-coverage protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If a traditional bumper design without reinforcement block is used, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the longitudinal movement during collision causes increased damage to surrounding components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddamage to surrounding components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement block is pre-installed on the bumper beam before final assembly, positioning it in advance to provide immediate protection during collision. This preliminary action ensures that the energy-absorbing component is already in place to prevent damage to surrounding components like the fascia panel and liftgate, without complicating the overall manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement block acts as an intermediary element between the bumper beam and the fascia panel. During collision, it absorbs and dissipates impact forces, preventing direct contact between the bumper beam and surrounding components. This intermediary function reduces harmful effects to surrounding components while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reinforcement block effectively reduces the extent of damage to critical vehicle components like the liftgate and back panel by absorbing energy and limiting intrusion, thereby decreasing repair costs and improving Low Speed Damageability ratings.

Implementation Method 1

configured to absorb energy and to eliminate contact of the upper portion with the fascia during a collision

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS9975507B2Reinforcement block
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9975507B2 patent drawing
  • US9975507B2 patent drawing
  • US9975507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle bumper assembly may include a fascia, a bumper beam arranged inside of the fascia including an upper portion and a lower portion, and a reinforcement block arranged only on the upper portion of the bumper beam and configured to absorb energy and to eliminate contact of the upper portion with the fascia during a collision.