Ion Beam Control via Segmented Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ion implantation systems face limitations in beam current operation range, leading to either under-focusing or over-focusing of ion beams, which restricts the throughput in semiconductor manufacturing, especially when beam current is above 9 mA or below 0.5 mA.

Innovation Solution

An ion implantation system with a terminal suppression electrode, an independently driven lens, and a focus electrode, each applying distinct potentials to control the ion beam, allowing for a wider beam current operation range from 0.1 mA to 25.7 mA, enabling precise control and increased throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If beam current is increased to increase throughput, then production throughput is improved, but beam focusing deteriorates (beam becomes under-focused and unable to be transported through beam-line)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction throughputVSAvoidbeam focusing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The accelerator is divided into multiple independently controllable electrodes (terminal electrode, focus electrode, and lens) with separate voltage supplies. This segmentation allows each electrode to be optimized for different beam current conditions, enabling the system to maintain proper beam focusing across a wide current range from 0.1 mA to 25.7 mA while achieving high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If beam current is decreased to improve focusing, then beam focusing precision is improved, but production throughput deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam focusing precisionVSAvoidproduction throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic voltage control of the lens electrode based on beam current conditions. The lens voltage is adjusted dynamically to compensate for changes in beam current, allowing the system to maintain optimal focusing across the full operating range from low current (0.1 mA) to high current (25.7 mA), thus achieving both precision and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional accelerator structure is used, then device complexity is low, but beam current operation range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam current operation rangeVSAvoidaccelerator structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The accelerator structure is segmented into multiple electrodes (terminal, focus, and lens) with independent voltage supplies. This segmentation increases the beam current operation range from the conventional limited range to 0.1 mA - 25.7 mA, while the added complexity is managed through modular design where each electrode can be controlled independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lens electrode serves multiple functions: it acts as a focusing element for low beam currents and as a beam transport element for high beam currents. This multi-functionality allows a single electrode to adapt to different operating conditions, expanding the overall operation range without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved production throughput by extending the beam current operation range, allowing for high dose ion implantation in the 60 keV to 300 keV energy range, specifically benefiting power device fabrication with minimal structural changes, thus enhancing manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the terminal suppression electrode is configured to conduct the ion beam through an aperture of the terminal suppression electrode and to apply a first potential to the ion beam from a first voltage supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

the lens is configured to conduct the ion beam through an aperture of the lens and to apply a second potential to the ion beam from a second voltage supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 3

a lens coupled to the terminal and disposed adjacent the terminal suppression electrode, wherein the lens is configured to conduct the ion beam through an aperture of the lens and to apply a second potential to the ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic Lens: Electrostatic Lens

Implementation Method 4

a focus electrode configured to receive the ion beam from the lens, wherein the focus electrode is configured to apply a third potential to the ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS9679745B2Controlling an ion beam in a wide beam current operation range
Publication Date: 2017.06.13 VARIAN SEMICON EQUIP ASSC INC
  • US9679745B2 patent drawing
  • US9679745B2 patent drawing
  • US9679745B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are approaches for controlling an ion beam within an accelerator/decelerator. In an exemplary approach, an ion implantation system includes an ion source for generating an ion beam, and a terminal suppression electrode coupled to a terminal, wherein the terminal suppression electrode is configured to conduct the ion beam through an aperture of the terminal suppression electrode and to apply a first potential to the ion beam from a first voltage supply. The system further includes a lens coupled to the terminal and disposed adjacent the terminal suppression electrode, wherein the lens is configured to conduct the ion beam through an aperture of the lens and to apply a second potential to the ion beam from a second voltage supply. In an exemplary approach, the lens is electrically insulated from the terminal suppression electrode and independently driven, thus allowing for an increased beam current operation range.