Ion Trap Electrode Trenching for Sub-3 μm Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ion trap fabrication technologies struggle to produce microstructured electrode segments with materials like Ni, Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, and Ir, as these materials are difficult to etch with chemical dry etching, limiting the ability to achieve widths smaller than 3 μm, which is necessary for advanced ion trapping devices.

Innovation Solution

A method involving physical and chemical dry etching is used to form trenches in multiple metal layers, allowing for the separation of electrode segments with widths less than 3 μm, using materials such as Ni, Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, and Ir, by first etching the second metal layer and then the first metal layer, ensuring precise and scalable ion trap fabrication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If chemical dry etching is used to etch metal layers, then the etching process is simple, but it cannot etch materials like Ni, Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Ag, and Ir, limiting trench width to larger than 3 μm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrench widthVSAvoidetching process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The etching process is segmented into two distinct stages: physical dry etching for the second metal layer and chemical dry etching for the first metal layer. This segmentation allows each etching method to be optimized for its suitable material, enabling precise trench width control down to 3 μm or less while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Physical dry etching is performed as a preliminary action before chemical dry etching. By first creating trenches in the second metal layer using physical etching, the subsequent chemical etching of the first metal layer can proceed with better control and precision, ultimately achieving the desired narrow trench width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If physical and chemical dry etching are used in sequence, then trenches with width ≤3 μm can be achieved, but the fabrication process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrench widthVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is segmented into distinct etching stages with clear boundaries: physical dry etching for the second metal layer followed by chemical dry etching for the first metal layer. This segmentation, while increasing process steps, provides better control over trench width and reduces variability, ultimately simplifying process control despite the additional step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The etching parameters are changed between stages: physical dry etching parameters are optimized for the second metal layer, then chemical dry etching parameters are optimized for the first metal layer. This parameter optimization at each stage enables precise trench width control (≤3 μm) without requiring excessive process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If wider trenches are used, then fabrication is easier, but ion shielding and control are reduced, increasing unwanted heating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication easeVSAvoidion heating
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical constraint of trench width with a process-based solution: using sequential physical and chemical dry etching to achieve narrow trenches. This substitution allows the system to overcome material etching limitations and achieve the required narrow dimensions for proper ion shielding, thereby reducing ion heating without sacrificing fabrication feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of ion trap devices with improved ion shielding and control, reducing unwanted heating and surface impurities, enhancing the stability and fidelity of ion manipulation.

Implementation Method 1

performing physical dry etching to form one or more first trenches in the second metal layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical dry etching:

Implementation Method 2

performing chemical dry etching to form one or more second trenches in the first metal layer below the one or more first trenches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical dry etching:

Data Source

PatentUS20260011466A1Device for trapping ions and methods for fabricating same
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • US20260011466A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011466A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011466A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fabricating a device for trapping ions includes forming a first metal layer over a substrate. The first metal layer is made of a first material. The method further includes forming a second metal layer over the first metal layer. The second metal layer is made of a second material different from the first material. The method further includes performing physical dry etching to form one or more first trenches in the second metal layer. The one or more first trenches extend to a lower side of the second metal layer. The method further includes performing chemical dry etching to form one or more second trenches in the first metal layer below the one or more first trenches. The one or more second trenches extend to a lower side of the first metal layer.