Ionic Liquid Catalyst Regeneration via Aluminum Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for regenerating chloroaluminate ionic liquid catalysts are inefficient due to the deactivation caused by conjunct polymers, which form complexes with the catalyst, reducing its activity and requiring frequent replacement, leading to economic challenges in alkylation processes.

Innovation Solution

A process involving reacting the spent ionic liquid catalyst with aluminum metal in a stirred or fixed bed reactor to free conjunct polymers, followed by solvent extraction in a stirred or packed column to remove them, effectively breaking the complexation and restoring catalyst activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ionic liquid catalyst is used in alkylation reactions, then catalytic activity is achieved, but conjunct polymers form and deactivate the catalyst over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a regeneration system where deactivated ionic liquid catalyst is treated with aluminum metal to release conjunct polymers, which are then separated by extraction. This allows the catalyst to be recovered and reused, transforming a single-use consumable into a recyclable resource.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses solvent extraction to remove conjunct polymers from the ionic liquid catalyst phase. This separation process extracts the harmful polymers into an organic phase while leaving the regenerated catalyst in the ionic liquid phase, enabling catalyst reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If ionic liquid catalyst is reused to reduce costs, then economic efficiency improves, but catalyst deactivation reduces effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeconomic efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the deactivated catalyst by reacting it with aluminum metal, which reduces AlCl3 to AlCl2 and releases the conjunct polymers. This parameter change restores the catalyst's effectiveness for reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conjunct polymers are removed from catalyst, then catalyst activity is restored, but additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces aluminum metal as an intermediary substance that facilitates the release of conjunct polymers from the catalyst. The aluminum acts as a reducing agent that temporarily interacts with the catalyst system to enable polymer release, then can be separated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses liquid-liquid extraction with hydrocarbon solvents to separate conjunct polymers from the ionic liquid catalyst. This hydraulic separation process uses solvent phases to extract and remove the polymers efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves high conjunct polymer recovery rates (up to 99%) and efficiently regenerates the ionic liquid catalyst, preventing re-deactivation and reducing the need for frequent replacement, thus enhancing the economic viability of using ionic liquids in alkylation reactions.

Implementation Method 1

reacting the spent ionic liquid catalyst with aluminum metal to free the conjunct polymers from the ionic liquid catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

reacting the spent ionic liquid catalyst with aluminum metal in a stirred or fixed bed reactor to free conjunct polymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

separating the freed conjunct polymers from the catalyst phase by solvent extraction in a stirred extraction column or a packed column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS7732364B2Process for ionic liquid catalyst regeneration
Publication Date: 2010.06.08 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US7732364B2 patent drawing
  • US7732364B2 patent drawing
  • US7732364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A regeneration process for re-activating an ionic liquid catalyst, which is useful in a variety of reactions, especially alkylation reactions, and which has been deactivated by conjunct polymers. The process includes a reaction step and a solvent extraction step. The process comprises (a) providing the ionic liquid catalyst, wherein at least a portion of the ionic liquid catalyst is bound to conjunct polymers; and (b) reacting the ionic liquid catalyst with aluminum metal to free the conjunct polymers from the ionic liquid catalyst in a stirred reactor or a fixed reactor. The conjunct polymer is then separated from the catalyst phase by solvent extraction in a stirred extraction or packed column.