Ionization Gauge Emission Current Control for Cathode Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ionization gauges, particularly Bayard-Alpert gauges, face operational lifetime reduction due to high pressure and exposure to certain gas types, leading to cathode degradation and sputtering issues, which affect their ability to accurately measure pressure over extended periods.

Innovation Solution

An ionization gauge with a controller that dynamically adjusts the emission current of the electron source in response to sensed parameters such as pressure, cathode temperature, and gas species, reducing stress on the cathode and minimizing sputtering by varying the emission current profiles stored in memory and selectable by the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high emission current is used to maintain sensitivity at high pressure, then pressure measurement capability is improved, but cathode degradation and sputtering increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement capabilityVSAvoidcathode degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of emission current based on real-time pressure measurements. The controller automatically adjusts the emission current profile according to the detected pressure level, using higher currents only when necessary for accurate measurement at high pressures, and reducing currents when pressures are lower to minimize cathode degradation and sputtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the emission current parameter dynamically based on operating conditions. By monitoring pressure and adjusting the emission current accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between measurement accuracy and cathode preservation, preventing excessive current from causing degradation while maintaining sufficient sensitivity for pressure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high emission current is used to maintain sensitivity at high pressure, then pressure measurement capability is improved, but sputtering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement capabilityVSAvoidsputtering
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts emission current based on real-time pressure feedback. At high pressures where measurement sensitivity is critical, higher currents are permitted temporarily. When pressures decrease, the current is reduced automatically, minimizing ion bombardment energy and preventing sputtering of gauge components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses feedback from pressure measurements to regulate emission current. The system continuously monitors pressure and adjusts the emission current profile in response, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents excessive current from causing sputtering while maintaining measurement accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If emission current is reduced to minimize sputtering, then sputtering is reduced, but pressure measurement sensitivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesputteringVSAvoidpressure measurement sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using a fixed low current to minimize sputtering, the system employs dynamic current adjustment. The emission current is kept low during normal operation to reduce sputtering, but automatically increases when high pressure measurement is required, maintaining sensitivity without permanently exposing components to damaging current levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If fixed high emission current is used, then pressure measurement sensitivity is maintained, but operational lifetime decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure measurement sensitivityVSAvoidoperational lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces fixed high current operation with dynamic current control. The emission current is adjusted in real-time based on actual measurement needs, using high current only temporarily when high pressure measurement is required. This significantly reduces cumulative cathode stress and extends operational lifetime while maintaining measurement sensitivity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The emission current parameter is changed dynamically based on operating conditions rather than remaining fixed. By monitoring pressure and adjusting current accordingly, the system maintains measurement sensitivity during high-pressure operations while reducing current during lower-pressure periods, thereby extending the overall operational lifetime of the gauge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dynamic control of emission current extends the operational life of the ionization gauge, reduces sputtering, and maintains accurate pressure measurement across various pressure ranges, even at high pressures, while preventing cathode damage.

Implementation Method 1

a cathode filament to a controlled level to prevent damaging the ionization gauge from sputtering while operating at a predetermined pressure level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermionic emission: Thermionic Emission

Implementation Method 2

Electrons travel from the electron source to and through the anode, cycle back and forth within the anode, and are consequently retained within the anode. In their travel, the electrons collide with molecules and atoms of gas that constitute the atmosphere whose pressure is to be measured. This contact between the electrons and the gas creates ions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron impact ionization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 3

Sputtering is also a problem when operating the ionization gauge at high pressures, such as above 10−4 Torr in argon. Sputtering is a problem at high pressure since there is more gas to ionize. This sputtering is caused by high impact energies between ions and components of the ionization gauge.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSputtering: Sputtering

Data Source

PatentUS9383286B2Ionization gauge with emission current and bias potential control
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 MKS INSTR INC
  • US9383286B2 patent drawing
  • US9383286B2 patent drawing
  • US9383286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ionization gauge that measures pressure has an electron source that emits electrons, and an anode that defines an ionization space. The gauge also includes a collector electrode to collect ions formed by an impact between the electrons and a gas and to measure pressure based on the collected ions. The electron source is dynamically varied in emission current between a plurality of emission levels dependent on pressure and a second parameter other than pressure. The ionization gauge may also vary various operating parameters of the gauge components according to parameters stored in a non-volatile memory and selected by a user.