Item Review System With Comparative Feedback And Update Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users' perceptions of items can change over time due to exposure to newer versions or similar items, but they typically do not modify their previous reviews, leading to outdated feedback for others evaluating the same items.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects user review history and item similarity data to present users with the option to modify their previous reviews of similar items, using this data to provide a comparative perspective and solicit updated feedback, with timing constraints to ensure relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users submit reviews without modification options, then the review submission process is simple and quick, but the reviews become outdated and less accurate over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of reviewsVSAvoidcomplexity of review system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically identifying similar items and preparing modification prompts before the user needs to review. When a user reviews a new item, the system proactively presents previously submitted reviews of similar items for potential modification, eliminating the need for users to manually search for and update old reviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by presenting users with their previous reviews of similar items during the review process. This feedback loop allows users to compare their past assessments with current perceptions, enabling them to modify outdated reviews and maintain high accuracy without adding significant complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If users are prompted to modify previous reviews, then the accuracy and relevance of reviews improve, but the review process becomes more time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of reviewsVSAvoidtime for review process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively prompting users to modify only reviews of similar items rather than requiring updates to all previous reviews. The system identifies and presents only those previous reviews that are relevant to the current item being reviewed, allowing users to quickly assess and modify only when necessary, thus minimizing time loss while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system presents previous reviews of similar items, then users gain comparative perspective for more accurate reviews, but the information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of reviewsVSAvoidcomplexity of information processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary component that automatically identifies similar items based on item data and user review history. This intermediary process handles the complex matching and retrieval of similar items, presenting them to users in a structured format. This mediates between the user's review process and the complex data processing required to find and present relevant previous reviews, maintaining accuracy while managing information processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10275808B1Item review system that provides comparative information to reviewer
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10275808B1 patent drawing
  • US10275808B1 patent drawing
  • US10275808B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An item review system is disclosed that detects that an item reviewed or being reviewed by a user is similar to one or more items previously reviewed by the user. In some embodiments, the system provides an option for the user to modify the prior review of each such similar item, as may be desirable to capture the user's changed perception of the previously reviewed item. The system may additionally or alternatively display the prior review(s) as the user generates the new review, such that the user can take these prior reviews into consideration.