Just-in-Time Model Update Protocol for Cyber-Physical Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems face challenges in efficiently updating models to reflect changing environmental conditions, leading to inaccuracies and potential unsafe behaviors due to the high demand for computing resources and the introduction of delay times during updates.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a just-in-time model update protocol that schedules updates only when necessary, using data structures and communication paths to reduce memory usage, CPU cycles, and network bandwidth, thereby optimizing resource demand and ensuring safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If model updates are performed at a high rate to maintain accuracy, then model accuracy is improved, but computing resource consumption increases and delay time is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model update scheduling where the update rate is adjusted based on environmental conditions. The system monitors environmental parameters and dynamically determines when model updates are necessary, transitioning from static periodic updates to adaptive event-driven updates. This resolves the contradiction by making the update frequency dynamic rather than fixed, updating only when environmental changes warrant it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of update frequency based on environmental conditions. When environmental parameters indicate significant changes, the update frequency increases; when conditions are stable, updates are reduced or paused. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain accuracy only when necessary, reducing overall computing resource consumption while preserving model validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If model updates are performed at a high rate to maintain accuracy, then model accuracy is improved, but delay time during updates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddelay time during updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model update scheduling where the update rate is adjusted based on environmental conditions. The system monitors environmental parameters and dynamically determines when model updates are necessary, transitioning from static periodic updates to adaptive event-driven updates. This resolves the contradiction by making the update frequency dynamic rather than fixed, updating only when environmental changes warrant it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses environmental sensor data to self-determine when model updates are needed, rather than relying on external scheduling or fixed intervals. The environmental conditions themselves trigger the update process, allowing the system to serve its own timing needs based on actual operational requirements, thereby minimizing unnecessary delay times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Use of energy by moving object

If model updates are performed infrequently to reduce computing resource consumption, then computing resource usage is reduced, but model accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing resource consumptionVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where environmental sensor data continuously monitors conditions that affect model accuracy. This feedback loop provides information about when environmental changes have occurred, triggering model updates only when necessary. The feedback from environmental sensors allows the system to maintain accuracy by updating in response to actual changes rather than on a fixed schedule, reducing unnecessary computing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If frequent model updates are performed to maintain accuracy, then model accuracy is improved, but network bandwidth usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of update frequency based on environmental conditions. When environmental parameters indicate significant changes, the update frequency increases; when conditions are stable, updates are reduced or paused. This parameter adaptation allows the system to maintain accuracy only when necessary, reducing overall network bandwidth consumption while preserving model validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250045637A1Systems and methods for performing situation-aware control system model updates
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US20250045637A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045637A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045637A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for parsimoniously updating cyber-system models based on then-current conditions. A wide variety of cyber-physical system models are deployed for ensuring that a system operates within its constraints while nevertheless achieving an assigned mission. Updating models is resource intensive, and thus should be done only when a particular degree of accuracy of a model is needed. Modern cyber-physical systems comprise sensors, transducers, and actuators that interoperate to carry out specific cyber-physical system behaviors. A control invariant barrier function (CBF) implements safety constraints that relate environmental parameters to safe behaviors of the cyber-physical system. Responsive to detected changes in the environment, a model update activity corresponding detected changes in the environment is initiated, but only when the result of such a model update impacts safe and/or mission-critical operation of the cyber-physical system. Invocation of model updates that would not impact safe operation of the cyber-physical system are suppressed.