Rapid-Prototyped Laminate Robots for Adaptive Locomotion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic devices face challenges in navigating challenging environments like sandy deserts due to inaccuracies in simulations used for locomotion strategy development, which require prior knowledge of ground composition and are time-consuming, leading to discrepancies between simulated and real-world performance.

Innovation Solution

A combination of rapid prototyping and sample-efficient reinforcement learning methods for robotic device design, allowing for swift adaptation to environmental changes and efficient learning of locomotion policies, using laminate robotic devices with interchangeable fins and the Group Factor Policy Search algorithm to optimize locomotion strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If simulations are used to develop locomotion strategies, then development time is reduced, but accuracy of performance prediction deteriorates due to approximations and lack of prior ground composition knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment timeVSAvoidperformance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-fabricating multiple robot prototypes with different morphologies using rapid prototyping techniques before deployment. This allows the system to have ready-made variations that can be quickly swapped out during field testing, eliminating the need for extensive simulation and iterative manufacturing in the field. The preliminary preparation of multiple designs resolves the contradiction by enabling fast physical testing without requiring accurate prior simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through interchangeable morphological components and reconfigurable robot designs. This allows the robot system to dynamically adapt its physical configuration based on real-world performance feedback rather than relying on fixed simulation-based designs. The dynamic reconfiguration capability enables rapid adaptation to actual environmental conditions, improving prediction accuracy while maintaining fast development cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If traditional physical testing is used to guide robot design, then accuracy of design validation is improved, but time consumption and material deterioration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign validation accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the robot into modular components with standardized interfaces, particularly focusing on interchangeable morphological elements. This modular architecture allows individual components to be tested and validated separately through rapid prototyping, then assembled into complete systems. The segmentation enables accurate design validation through physical testing of specific components without requiring complete system re-manufacturing, thus reducing overall testing time while maintaining validation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements discarding and recovering by using rapid prototyping to create inexpensive, disposable test prototypes that can be quickly fabricated, tested, and replaced. Rather than repeatedly testing and repairing expensive traditional robot designs, the system discards failed prototypes and recovers successful designs for further development. This approach maintains high design validation accuracy through physical testing while dramatically reducing time consumption and material deterioration costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If rapid prototyping is used to manufacture robotic devices, then iteration speed is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases due to multi-material laminate fabrication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiteration speedVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by developing a standardized rapid prototyping platform with universal interfaces and common manufacturing processes that can produce multiple different robot morphologies. The multi-material laminate fabrication system is designed as a universal platform capable of creating various component types (body sections, limbs, sensors mounts) using the same base technology. This universality enables fast iteration across different designs without requiring separate manufacturing setups for each morphology, thus improving productivity while managing manufacturing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11148286B2Systems and methods for rapid-prototyped robotic devices
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11148286B2 patent drawing
  • US11148286B2 patent drawing
  • US11148286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments for fast prototyping of morphologies and controllers related to locomotion for a robotic device are disclosed.