Aircraft Landing Event Analysis Using Runway and Retardation Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft landing distance calculations rely on conservative assumptions about runway conditions, leading to inaccurate performance indicators and potential inefficiencies in fuel burn and noise pollution.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft landing event system that utilizes a processor to select and analyze aircraft landing event data based on environmental and retardation information, determining a performance indicator like a landing distance factor by comparing with similar past events, using machine learning and regression models to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative assumptions about runway conditions are used in landing distance calculations, then safety is ensured, but accuracy of performance indicators deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidaccuracy of performance indicators
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from actual runway condition reports (wet, dry, icy) and aircraft performance data to continuously improve landing distance calculations. By comparing predicted performance with actual outcomes and updating the model based on real-world feedback, the system achieves both safety and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the parameters used in landing distance calculations based on actual runway conditions. Instead of using fixed conservative assumptions, the system adjusts performance indicators according to real-time environmental parameters (runway wetness, temperature, wind) and aircraft state, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining safety through data-driven adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conservative assumptions about aircraft state are made, then safety margins are maintained, but fuel burn and noise pollution increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginsVSAvoidfuel burn
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the aircraft to self-assess its own performance characteristics by using stored aircraft performance data and current state information. The aircraft independently determines its landing distance requirements based on actual conditions rather than relying on conservative external assumptions, allowing for optimized fuel consumption while maintaining safety through self-verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts performance parameters (landing distance, thrust requirements, braking forces) based on actual aircraft state and environmental conditions. By changing from fixed conservative parameters to dynamic, condition-based parameters, the system reduces unnecessary fuel burn and noise while maintaining safety margins through continuous monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conservative assumptions are used in landing calculations, then safety is prioritized, but operational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor actual landing outcomes and compare them with predicted performance. This feedback mechanism allows the system to optimize operational efficiency by learning from actual performance data while maintaining safety through ongoing validation and adjustment of landing calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static conservative parameters to dynamic, condition-based parameters that adapt to real-time environmental and aircraft state changes. This enables optimized operational efficiency through precise, condition-specific calculations while maintaining safety through continuous data-driven adjustment and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12428139B2Aircraft landing event system and method
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 AIRBUS (SAS)
  • US12428139B2 patent drawing
  • US12428139B2 patent drawing
  • US12428139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft landing event system including a processor communicatively coupled with memory storing aircraft landing event data. The processor is configured to receive environment information representative of an environmental condition of a runway approached by an aircraft and receive retardation information representative of a retardation demand of the aircraft during an anticipated landing event of the aircraft on the runway. The processor is further configured to select aircraft landing event data from the memory based on the environment information and the retardation information and determine a performance indicator for the landing event based on the aircraft landing event data selected by the processor. The processor is further configured to communicate the performance indicator to a landing system of the aircraft.